Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted
Felix now has 32 strikeouts and 2 walks this year.

 

Josh Towers had 32 K's and 4 BB's in his first 8 starts during the 2005 season. He was also 23/1 during his first 5 starts. I love pitchers who have great control and throw strikes.

Posted
The stream I was watching only showed half the screen.

 

Cubs Yankees is on WGN though

 

Porn on xxxPutasZorras.canada

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sorry, wrong forum

Posted

Brad Radke had 34 strikeouts and 1 walk in his first 8 starts during the 2005 season.

 

60 strikeouts and 4 walks in his first 14 starts that season. Crazy!

Posted
Brad Radke had 34 strikeouts and 1 walk in his first 8 starts during the 2005 season.

 

60 strikeouts and 4 walks in his first 14 starts that season. Crazy!

 

Thanks x 10

 

Radke minus dingers was Maddux lite lol

Posted
Prepare to spend a lot of time watching other games while the Jays are playing.

Or watch the Jays AND other games at once! MLB.TV is the best.

Posted
Loved Brad Radke. No stuff to speak of, but the guy threw 200 pretty effective innings every year. A right-handed Buehrle with a few more ticks on the fastball.

 

Loved Brad Radke as well. Great pitcher to watch back in the day! Vastly underrated.

Posted

d'Arnaud's playing time in jeopardy:

 

http://espn.go.com/blog/new-york/mets/post/_/id/84609/recker-likely-to-see-increased-playing-time?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

 

Wasn't d'Arnaud supposed to make us regret trading for Dickey? I'm not seeing it so far. Oh, and his defense has been bad as well. Gotta wonder if the Mets will go to Recker more, or even consider promoting Teagarden or Centeno(who's hitting .292/.433/.333 in Vegas and on the 40 man)

Posted

Carlos Silva - 71 strikeouts, and only 9 WALKS! in 188.1 innings back in 2005 lol.

 

0.43 BB/9 is absurd for a pitcher with almost 200 innings!

Posted
Carlos Silva - 71 strikeouts, and only 9 WALKS! in 188.1 innings back in 2005 lol.

 

0.43 BB/9 is absurd for a pitcher with almost 200 innings!

 

League Leader the next season in HR given up when batters realized he wasn't walking anyone.

Posted
d'Arnaud's playing time in jeopardy:

 

http://espn.go.com/blog/new-york/mets/post/_/id/84609/recker-likely-to-see-increased-playing-time?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

 

Wasn't d'Arnaud supposed to make us regret trading for Dickey? I'm not seeing it so far. Oh, and his defense has been bad as well. Gotta wonder if the Mets will go to Recker more, or even consider promoting Teagarden or Centeno(who's hitting .292/.433/.333 in Vegas and on the 40 man)

 

Weather he succeeds or fails really doesn't matter.

 

What matters is the fact he was a top 10 prospect and a the top catching prospect when we traded him. He had huge value last year as did Synder and we f***ing wasted both those chips on a 40 year junk ballin trick pitcher

Posted
Weather he succeeds or fails really doesn't matter.

 

What matters is the fact he was a top 10 prospect and a the top catching prospect when we traded him. He had huge value last year as did Synder and we f***ing wasted both those chips on a 40 year junk ballin trick pitcher

 

Actually it does matter.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Actually it does matter.

 

Not really. The trade will be bad regardless of outcome because of the process. I guess there's something to be said about projecting talent and internal evaluation but I don't really know how far that can get you when you're trading two top 20 prospects for a knuckle baller with a bad back.

Posted
4th with 2.6 runs saved framing.

JFaS, how much time does it take for whiff rate to stabilize? The league leaders in it is an interesting mix.

Posted
Two more strikeouts in a 1-2-3 5th for Felix. That 88-90mph changeup thing he's throwing has been unhittable through four starts. Guy is on a different level right now.

 

Jose "The defector" Fernandez level

Posted
You get what he's saying though. d'Arnaud had huge value as an asset at the time, and it was cashed in for a piece that doesn't look that valuable at all.

 

You can't have this argument one way and not the other.

Posted
You get what he's saying though. d'Arnaud had huge value as an asset at the time, and it was cashed in for a piece that doesn't look that valuable at all.

 

Yes thank you my friend!!

Posted
Dickey was 38 at the time with a year of team control. He never looked valuable enough to warrant the return.

 

Fair enough. I don't think many people loved the trade at the time either. And I imagine if d'Arnaud was actually performing well this board would go total apeshit.

Posted
Fair enough. I don't think many people loved the trade at the time either. And I imagine if d'Arnaud was actually performing well this board would go total apeshit.

 

No, most people weren't too happy with how much we had to give up. I think the board was more split though on whether people cared too much regarding d'Arnaud. Everyone hated giving up Synder.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Blue Jays community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...