BarrysSyringe Verified Member Posted December 10, 2013 Posted December 10, 2013 It was a 3 way deal. Where are you seeing this?
bronson44 Verified Member Posted December 10, 2013 Posted December 10, 2013 Steve Clarke @SteveClarkeMLB 1m I'm no detective, but my wild guess is S.Santos was headed to #Rangers in 3-tm Craig Gentry deal, w/Brett Anderson coming to #Jays.
Mikeleelop Verified Member Posted December 10, 2013 Posted December 10, 2013 Steve Clarke @SteveClarkeMLB 1m I'm no detective, but my wild guess is S.Santos was headed to #Rangers in 3-tm Craig Gentry deal, w/Brett Anderson coming to #Jays. Anderson fail physical?
admin Site Manager Posted December 10, 2013 Posted December 10, 2013 AA's comments regarding Fister indicate Dombrowski had a hard-on for one or more of the players he traded him for. Sometimes when people get tunnel vision there is no coming back. I know, but I just don't trust what AA says.
TheHurl Site Manager Posted December 10, 2013 Posted December 10, 2013 Anderson fail physical? Like he's ever passed one
JaysRap Verified Member Posted December 10, 2013 Posted December 10, 2013 I don't see how Santos does NOT get traded - pretty much outta the bag now.
Dr. Dinger Old-Timey Member Posted December 10, 2013 Posted December 10, 2013 Steve Clarke @SteveClarkeMLB 1m I'm no detective, but my wild guess is S.Santos was headed to #Rangers in 3-tm Craig Gentry deal, w/Brett Anderson coming to #Jays. This would have been acceptable.
ElNik2013 Old-Timey Member Posted December 10, 2013 Posted December 10, 2013 At least it shows AA is looking to deal a reliever.
ElNik2013 Old-Timey Member Posted December 10, 2013 Posted December 10, 2013 After Janssen, Santos is probably the most ideal of the big-4 to be dealt. He gets expensive next year ($6 million) and has a 750K buyout. I'd like to see both moved. Oh yeah, I've said all along, I'd move both, that's like 7M in payroll space depending on what type of salary would be coming back of course. If the guy coming back was indeed Anderson, it would be a 4M increase in payroll for next year. Of course, the guy could've been on the DL all year also but so could Santos. Anyway, at least some good signs.
fatcowxlive Old-Timey Member Posted December 10, 2013 Posted December 10, 2013 Steve Clarke @SteveClarkeMLB 1m I'm no detective, but my wild guess is S.Santos was headed to #Rangers in 3-tm Craig Gentry deal, w/Brett Anderson coming to #Jays. Santos for Brett Anderson? Damn AA pulled a good one IMO.
fatcowxlive Old-Timey Member Posted December 10, 2013 Posted December 10, 2013 "wild guess" You're a wild guess!
fatcowxlive Old-Timey Member Posted December 10, 2013 Posted December 10, 2013 So Anderson failed the physical Prob good it didnt happen Imagine if he wasn't made out of glass... then we would have had him two weeks ago!
8D Verified Member Posted December 10, 2013 Posted December 10, 2013 Steve Clarke @SteveClarkeMLB 1m I'm no detective, but my wild guess is S.Santos was headed to #Rangers in 3-tm Craig Gentry deal, w/Brett Anderson coming to #Jays. Makes sense. I would be OK w/ that deal.
theblujay Verified Member Posted December 10, 2013 Posted December 10, 2013 Nothing, deal fell through I mean what happens with Santos
fatcowxlive Old-Timey Member Posted December 10, 2013 Posted December 10, 2013 I mean what happens with Santos He goes to Texas for free
TwistedLogic Old-Timey Member Posted December 10, 2013 Posted December 10, 2013 This is the exact deal that I assumed they were talking about, the Gentry one. Though I'd have much preferred to be the ones landing Gentry. Don't care much at all for bringing in another china doll into the rotation to take a spot away from Hutch/Drabek/Happ. We still have no idea what those guys are worth and if they can put it together.
TheHurl Site Manager Posted December 10, 2013 Posted December 10, 2013 Fatcow, the starter for reliever deal is only good if the starter can actually throw more innings than the reliever.
fatcowxlive Old-Timey Member Posted December 10, 2013 Posted December 10, 2013 Fatcow, the starter for reliever deal is only good if the starter can actually throw more innings than the reliever. You think Anderson can't out pitch Santos? SS 2013: 25.2 IP. BA 2013: 44.2 IP
Angrioter Old-Timey Member Posted December 10, 2013 Author Posted December 10, 2013 Not sure if it was posted, but did anyone see this? Possible the Rangers were targeting Kemp and Santos? Something like: Rangers: Kemp (Dodgers), Santos (Blue Jays) Dodgers: Ogando (Rangers), Scheppers (Rangers) Blue Jays: Dee Gordon (Dodgers) or maybe since was reported SP: Josh Beckett? With Kemp failing the physical? You're a good writer but.................suck as a speculator.
G-Snarls Community Moderator Posted December 10, 2013 Posted December 10, 2013 AA's comments regarding Fister indicate Dombrowski had a hard-on for one or more of the players he traded him for. Sometimes when people get tunnel vision there is no coming back. Yep. And it's one of the things that makes him a worse GM.
G-Snarls Community Moderator Posted December 10, 2013 Posted December 10, 2013 I don't understand what Carroll in saying in that poorly constructed sentence Edit: Oh, now I get it - teams that were interested in Kemp are now out (no longer interested) due to problems identified on his medical reports. Now I get it.
G-Snarls Community Moderator Posted December 10, 2013 Posted December 10, 2013 (edited) I'm dying to know who we were (presumably) going to be getting from the Dodgers Edited December 10, 2013 by G-Snarls
G-Snarls Community Moderator Posted December 10, 2013 Posted December 10, 2013 So what happens now? Trade Bautista for Holland (OK, seriously joking and hoping not true)
theblujay Verified Member Posted December 10, 2013 Posted December 10, 2013 He's still on our team I can't decide which of the big 3 is my least favorite (GD King Fatcow). What the hell do we do with a player who we basically told is getting traded, but now is still on the team?
G-Snarls Community Moderator Posted December 10, 2013 Posted December 10, 2013 (edited) What the hell do we do with a player who we basically told is getting traded, but now is still on the team? It's business. He may play for us in 2014 and if he's a professional he'll be OK with that. Also very possible AA trades him to someone else. Edited December 10, 2013 by G-Snarls
GD Old-Timey Member Posted December 10, 2013 Posted December 10, 2013 I can't decide which of the big 3 is my least favorite (GD King Fatcow). We all apologize for not being as dumn as you.
fatcowxlive Old-Timey Member Posted December 10, 2013 Posted December 10, 2013 I can't decide which of the big 3 is my least favorite (GD King Fatcow). What the hell do we do with a player who we basically told is getting traded, but now is still on the team? He stays! We tell him to suck it up lol, he probably gets moved tho, he can probably draw interest
HERPDERP Old-Timey Member Posted December 10, 2013 Posted December 10, 2013 I don't see Santos as the type of guy to make a fuss. The guy is a professional. If the same thing happened to an Arencibia, a Brandon Phillips, or a David Price, however...
JoJo Parker Dunedin Blue Jays - A SS On Tuesday, Parker was just 1-for-5, but the one hit was his first professional home run. Explore JoJo Parker News >
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now