Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted
Gotta love the off season! I feel like Bautista will be traded, but not in the off season. I think it'll be around mid to late July next year as the team admits the "all in" strategy didn't work. He and EE will fetch quite the haul for the next rebuilding phase.

 

This is when a team needs to s*** or get off the pot. Nothing good can come from 'half trying' to contend. We need to spend more cash or rebuild ASAP. The 'all-in' could have worked if we had a Ricky Romero and Brandon Morrow who were any good. If we don't spend to fill those gaps, its time to trade Reyes, EE, and Bautista, which would get us a s*** LOAD.

  • Replies 195
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
This is when a team needs to s*** or get off the pot. Nothing good can come from 'half trying' to contend. We need to spend more cash or rebuild ASAP. The 'all-in' could have worked if we had a Ricky Romero and Brandon Morrow who were any good. If we don't spend to fill those gaps, its time to trade Reyes, EE, and Bautista, which would get us a s*** LOAD.

 

 

Well, they won't do the rebuild now, but I feel they'll admit defeat either by next July or next off season, in the mean time, they'll probably trade Stroman and or Sanchez.

Posted
I like his bat, but he's a real defensive liability. Any idea if scouts think he can become a lg-average defender?

Mediocre hitter plus awful defense. Stay away. Biddle, Franco, Ruf and Kendrick for Bautista and JPA. sounds good...

Posted
They won't get a good starter unless trading one of Bautista or Encarnacion. Jays must be looking at a 4th starter type. Unless he purges what's left in the farm?
Posted

Lawrie, Rasmus, Reyes, Bautista, EE, Sanchez, and Stroman are the only pieces that open the door to a frontline starter

 

Of these, Bautista is the one I would move.... pretty obvious

Posted
Lawrie, Rasmus, Reyes, Bautista, EE, Sanchez, and Stroman are the only pieces that open the door to a frontline starter

 

Of these, Bautista is the one I would move.... pretty obvious

 

100%

Posted
Lawrie, Rasmus, Reyes, Bautista, EE, Sanchez, and Stroman are the only pieces that open the door to a frontline starter

 

Of these, Bautista is the one I would move.... pretty obvious

 

Jays have a hole in RF then. I highly doubt Jays are adding a frontline pitcher.

Posted
Jays have a hole in RF then. I highly doubt Jays are adding a frontline pitcher.

 

No problem moving Rasmus to RF and Gose to CF. Defense in the outfield would be vastly improved. I think it is time we get off the Bautista bandwagon before it crashes and I think it could be any year now.

Posted
No problem moving Rasmus to RF and Gose to CF. Defense in the outfield would be vastly improved. I think it is time we get off the Bautista bandwagon before it crashes and I think it could be any year now.

 

I'd rather move Reyes and sign Jed Lowrie

Posted

I hate the idea of dealing Rasmus. I think he finally figured it out last year. New stance, he seems comfortable. Guy is a potential superstar in the making if it all clicks. He seems like he likes playing here too. I wouldn't be surprised to see him extended.

 

Anthony Gose in CF for the next 3-4 years is nauseating. Guy is not an MLB starter with that bat.

Posted
I hate the idea of dealing Rasmus. I think he finally figured it out last year. New stance, he seems comfortable. Guy is a potential superstar in the making if it all clicks. He seems like he likes playing here too. I wouldn't be surprised to see him extended.

 

Heck yes keep Rasmus. Extend now 4 years 28M. Do it.

Posted
Heck yes keep Rasmus. Extend now 4 years 28M. Do it.

 

If he signs for that, I would advise him to fire his agent.

Posted
If he signs for that, I would advise him to fire his agent.

 

It's team friendly yes. But he's been year to year for quite a while now and figures to get no more than 5M in arbitration and have to prove himself again. I'm not sure he turns that down. And I'd go an extra 1-2M per year or add a 5th if needed to seal the deal.

Posted
Try 5 years, 65 million

 

I don't think it would take that much. He hasn't earned a salary > 10M yet. He's had exactly one full really good season.

Posted
It's team friendly yes. But he's been year to year for quite a while now and figures to get no more than 5M in arbitration and have to prove himself again. I'm not sure he turns that down. And I'd go an extra 1-2M per year or add a 5th if needed to seal the deal.

 

He made 4.675M last year and is coming off a 4.8 WAR season. He'll get a hell of a lot more than 5M in arbitration.

Posted
He made 4.675M last year and is coming off a 4.8 WAR season. He'll get a hell of a lot more than 5M in arbitration.

 

You're right

 

He's projected for 6.5 by MLBTR

 

My offer needs to be revised. LOL.

Posted
You're right

 

He's projected for 6.5 by MLBTR

 

My offer needs to be revised. LOL.

 

I think something like 4/40 would be fair. That would still make him a FA at age 31 for a big payday if his numbers stabilize nicely, and the team could presumably backload the contract to help for this year and next year's payroll issues. Maybe something like 5,5,15,15

Posted

New offer

 

Rasmus 4 years 40M guaranteed, 5 years 54M with option

 

2014 - 8

2015 - 10

2016 - 10

2017 - 12

2018 - 14 (2 M buyout)

Posted
I don't think it would take that much. He hasn't earned a salary > 10M yet. He's had exactly one full really good season.

 

I think 5/65 is probably what it would take. Something where he gets $3M in 2014, followed by 12/16/17/17. It frees up a bit more for the coming year, and the 2015 salary is team friendly. From 2016 onwards a lot of money will be off he books which makes this type of contract work.

Posted
New offer

 

Rasmus 4 years 40M guaranteed, 5 years 54M with option

 

2014 - 8

2015 - 10

2016 - 10

2017 - 12

2018 - 14 (2 M buyout)

 

Your scenario commits more money to him in 2014 than what he is expected to make. I would think AA tries to get it below his projected salary to free more money in the short term.

Posted
Your scenario commits more money to him in 2014 than what he is expected to make. I would think AA tries to get it below his projected salary to free more money in the short term.

 

Yeah if AA extends him now he'll probably try to save in 2014 so he can afford pitching, hoping Stoman and Sanchez save him $$ after next year.

Posted
Has AA allowed any player to actually get to arbitration?? He usually seems to extend or do 1 year deals to avoid it.
Posted
Has AA allowed any player to actually get to arbitration?? He usually seems to extend or do 1 year deals to avoid it.

 

I would be shocked if AA doesn't either extend Rasmus or trade him.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Blue Jays community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...