I guess that makes more sense, except for IF, Huff is telling the truth, the CEO stated, (according to his Twitter) that his support for Trump was part of the reason.
If that was not a factor, and it was just his "other" types of Tweets, then to me that is more understandable. IF, the CEO did say support for Trump being a reason. I still think that is BS, and the CEO should have kept his reasoning and statement related to "other" offensive Tweets.