I suspect they put IKF in at 2nd because Bieber induces more ground balls (48%) than flyballs (33%) and thus infield defense was considered more valuable than OF defense to start the game (especially when neither Straw nor IKF can hit).
If Schneider starts at 2nd base last night and he boots a couple of balls or can't turn a key double play, then, IMO, that would be MUCH more worthy of criticism.
The decisions seemed rational to me last night - there's just always a certain probability they backfire or don't work. I think that's what happened.
Unbeknownst to some, blame doesn't have to be assigned to every decision and every outcome. Sometimes you do the right thing and it just doesn't work. The players aren't perfect and their performance isn't something you an control. It is what it is. We're still leading and get to play again today thankfully.
People claiming the outcome would have been different (ie better, with a 100% chance of winning instead) if the manager had done what they thought was right are just fooling themselves. Changing variables can have a wide variety of impacts on the outcome - both good and bad.