Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

glory

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    14,778
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

 Content Type 

Profiles

Toronto Blue Jays Videos

2026 Toronto Blue Jays Top Prospects Ranking

Toronto Blue Jays Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Toronto Blue Jays Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Toronto Blue Jays Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by glory

  1. I'm glad Khris Davis got his money, but damn he fell off hard this season.
  2. Ugh. Come on Oakland.
  3. Rooting for the A's, but I think the damn Rays are taking this one.
  4. If the Jays are going to sign a qualified FA, then go for Wheeler (assuming Cole is out of the picture), not Odorizzi. My point is I don't think the Jays are going to sign a qualified FA either way.
  5. I hope not. I think he'd be a good fit on the Jays. Has been successful in the AL East as well. If he gets the QO, then no way the Jays are losing a pick to sign him. If no QO is attached to either player, I say go with Odorizzi and Porcello. Two guys who have pitched in the AL East to success and are still young(ish). Porcello coming off a down year so he might get less, and Odorizzi coming off a really good year but track record is more along the lines of a 2.5 war pitcher. Looks like his velocity went up this year. I think Kyle Gibson is way more likely though.
  6. I think they are less likely to sign a qualified FA with a higher pick. Their available draft money will be high with a #5 pick. I think more likely this means we shop in the 2016 Happ and Estrada aisle of the market. Kyle Gibson types. I’d be pleasantly surprised if they go after someone like Wheeler but can’t see them signing a qualified FA just yet.
  7. The Nats seem to do that with all their big money contracts. I'm actually glad Harper turned it down and went with the Phillies.
  8. The Astros took back one of the worst SPs in baseball, a replacement level RP, and actual money in order to turn Fisher into Stevenson. You tell me whether Fisher had other suitors. Seems pretty cut and dry. Usually the team that absorbs s*** is getting something to compensate for absorbing s***. Fisher was in the PCL for the past two years and this year hit worse than Tellez and about equal to what McKinney did in the International League this year at younger ages. I actually think Fisher has some intriguing skills (BB%, speed, exit velocity), but damn, you guys are nuts if you think he's an asset, or was an asset at the time he was acquired. Certifiable nuts. If the Jays traded Alford tomorrow they'd get little to nothing in return. If the Jays traded Fisher tomorrow they'd get little to nothing in return. That's reality folks. Both likely suck. It's ok to admit it. It's remarkable that I've actually wanted Montoyo to give Fisher more playing time and people are saying I'm complaining about a trade that both teams are not going to get much out of it in all likelihood. I'll move on because my head hurts.
  9. ?????? If the Astros kept Fisher past the trade deadline, he was out of options and on a team that didn't want/need him. He was going to be DFA. You and Brownie are seriously making a stink about me thinking the Jays could have given up less than Stevenson for Fisher had they waited a few months? You guys need hobbies man. It's not that serious. Teoscar was in the same freakin spot two years ago and was traded for two months of the corpse of Francisco Liriano. What the hell are you guys talking about? I didn't say anything about Fisher's upside with the bat (which I've actually defended here), just his trade value at the time he was acquired and/or had they waited a few months. He's not an asset right now, with the Astros or the Jays. That's reality. I'm sorry you can't accept it.
  10. I liked this post because I'm legit baffled at what point you could have possibly disagreed with, much less felt the need to write "holy f***" in response to it. Spanky liking it put it over the top. Great post. 1. Rebuilding teams will claim Alford/Fisher because those teams usually suck and it's getting a former top prospect for nothing. 2. Fisher was likely to be DFA by the Astros if they kept him past the deadline. 3. Stevenson isn't much of a prospect but still a piece the Jays moved for a guy they might have gotten for free (or much less) in the winter. I'm guessing my backhanded praise of Stevenson is what you are angry about, lord knows you'd swing from his nuts if he was a Jay, but if you consider that hyping him up, I don't know what else to say. If you think points #1 and 2 are wrong, then I can't help you. If you think Fisher was going to be traded by the Astros in the winter for something even resembling a prospect, then again, I can't help you. What do you think Alford would fetch in a trade right now?
  11. Rebuilding/tanking teams would claim both 100% most likely. It's a free prospect with 5+ years of control left with previous prospect hype. Ironically, the Jays might have been able to get Fisher without giving up Stevenson had they waited until the winter. I know Stevenson may not be much, but still potential asset moved for a piece that was probably going to be DFA'd by the Astros.
  12. Between Alford and Fisher, I think both would get claimed (there are way too many tanking teams), but if I had to choose one who would get claimed, it would be Alford. He can actually play D and was a top prospect two years ago. A bad team would claim him and park him in CF all season. Fisher is more debatable since he looks like a DH/LF who (so far) can't hit.
  13. Lol, Teoscar had a better season than the guy they just extended for $50 million. The OF is a mess aside from Gurriel. I still think they'll stick with what they have in 2020 and make changes in 2021, but maybe Charlie knows something already.
  14. Buchholz taught him a new curveball grip and he’s been using it in September apparently. Small sample size but hopefully it leads to better performance in 2020. As is a 2 war in 150 innings is a pretty decent outcome for him.
  15. I suspect Shatkins will go with Gurriel/Hernandez/Grichuk in the OF with Fisher at DH and Alford as the 4th OF next season. I think the team clearly needs another OF but don't think we will see one next season. They'll give the current group one more chance next year.
  16. Not saying the Rays aren't a playoff team, just that they'd be death for MLB in terms of interest/ratings. I remember watching the Brewers games last year, and that crowd was electric. They are a small market team but those fans love the Brewers. They had an elite MVP player in Yelich. That's what I'm talking about. If you tell me I have to watch Austin Meadows as the top star, a s***** stadium with fans who don't really care about the team (they'd go to St. Pete if they were real fans), and something that is going to likely hurt MLB's national TV ratings, then yeah, I'm not going to root for it. The Jays are different. They are not America's darling team, but anyone who watched the 2015-16 playoffs commented on how hostile, rowdy, and passionate the live crowds were. You can sell that type of atmosphere on TV. Also, I fundamentally just hate the Rays. Can't root for them. Maybe them owning the Jays for as long as I can remember is part of the reason, but it's just ingrained in me now.
  17. The Rays don't have any elite players (unless you consider Meadows one), they play in a s*** hole stadium, they have no fans, and if they advance to the ALDS it would get lower ratings than reruns of 80s sitcoms. Plus, excessive pitching changes/openers, excessive shifting, etc, is boring as hell to watch. I'm not rooting for teams because they have ivy league front offices. Give me big markets, exciting players, etc. The Jays got a ton of media coverage in the US when Bautista hit the home run because we were loaded with star players. Tampa just has nothing to get excited about. If the Jays are not in the playoffs, then I'm rooting for baseball to succeed. Give me the Astros/Yankees in the ALCS and Dodgers/whoever in the NL side. NYY/LAD in the WS would be great for baseball. Only exception might be that I wouldn't mind if Billy Beane won a title, so if the A's happen to get by, then that's cool too.
  18. I can’t think of anything less desirable for MLB this post season than Tampa making it. MLB is a regional sport now but Tampa doesn’t even give a s*** about that team. I hope Oakland kills them (or the Jays sweep them this weekend and CLE gets in).
  19. Wow feels like Felix has been around forever and he's only 33. Glad to see him getting a good close in Seattle.
  20. That is surprisingly true. 55 of his 72 innings coming into this game have been against NYY, BOS, TAM, ATL, and LAD. At least we know he can dominate s***** teams.
  21. If it's two teams in a similar spot, and Cole is not anti-Canada, then maybe it wouldn't need to be as big of a difference. But if he's getting record breaking 7 year offers from LA, NY, Houston, etc, then the Jays can't simply offer a little bit more. They'd have to go above and beyond. I remember reading that the Yankees offer to Machado was something like $220m. The Padres had to give him $300m. The Jays can definitely sign Cole but they'd have to give a crazy offer. I'll concede that we don't know how Shapiro would act in a big(ger) market situation, so maybe he would spend on an elite FA if he had the resources (which he didn't in Cleveland), but I'm not sure he'd want to come close to the territory that Cole will be in.
  22. Sure but I’m sure the second highest offer for Machado was significantly less than what he signed for. Same with Harper. Cole is not going to take less money to sign with a good team or a team in the US, but I think the gap between the Jays and the 2nd best offer he gets would have to be pretty significant.
  23. It’s remarkable how quickly they turned things around too. They traded JD prior to 2015 in a horrible lopsided deal for them, but within 3 years became a 95+ win team again in consecutive seasons. They are literally getting no contribution from anyone in the JD deal either. Maybe Beane didn’t lose his mind four years ago after all.
  24. Yeah, it’s not a question of whether the Jays can afford a $35M AAV player, they definitely can. It’s whether they’d be willing to get into a bidding war that will likely lead to the biggest contract ever given to a pitcher in MLB history. That doesn’t seem like Shatkins at all. That’s not even factoring whether Cole would even want to come here, although I’m sure he has a price.
  25. That's all likely true, but the gap between the Yankees and the next highest bidder may not have to be as wide as the Jays and the next highest. The one advantage with Cole is that he's a Boras guy, and Boras guys would sign in Siberia as long as they got the most money from them, but I would think winning situation, location, etc, plays a significant role for everyone to some degree.
×
×
  • Create New...