Is 7 for 12 not a statistical decision why it might have been a good decision? Does it not make sense to try and get some speed at the top of the lineup? Does it not make sense to try and get a guy who was swing a hot bat in AAA in against a guy he has had success against to give him a bit of a confidence boost.
You make it sound like it was 100% the wrong decision, when there is plenty of evidence to support either side of this argument.
The decision worked out, and maybe it was pure asinine luck as you suggest, or perhaps it was a good decision. Seriously, with all the things you could fault John Gibbons on, and there's plenty out there, this is a long ways down the list.