If you came on here and said he sucks because I don't like this in his swing, or these are the things on the defensive side he does that I don't like. He does this on the base paths and for these reasons, he sucks. If you came on here and said his numbers suggest he sucks because of these reasons that would be one thing. Instead you come on here and say I'm the smartest man on the planet and have declared that he sucks.
It's really hard to judge whether young players are good or whether a young player sucks. Professional executives get this wrong all the time. There are things in Alford's swing that I wasn't in love with in the limited amount of time we saw him.
I have no clue what sort of adjustments he may have made. He has a .936 OPS in his last 167 plate appearances. Maybe he has made some adjustments. It would be one thing internally if you have concluded a guy sucks and you can't take away at bats from guys who you believe in more, but we have a 2 man bench. There are at bats to be had for him. It seems like awful asset management to not at least test your hypothesis that a guy sucks and not give him some time at the mlb level given our current situation.