Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

John_Havok

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    20,896
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    17

 Content Type 

Profiles

Toronto Blue Jays Videos

2026 Toronto Blue Jays Top Prospects Ranking

Toronto Blue Jays Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Toronto Blue Jays Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Toronto Blue Jays Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by John_Havok

  1. Is there an award to give a player after they're the comeback player of the year and the totally go to s*** again the next?
  2. I just re-read the rule, a tie would go to the runner as the rule states and the runner or 1b must be tagged by the fielder before the runner hits first base. So, if they both there at the same time, the runner cannot be out.
  3. Even if it was a tie, the runner should be out. The rule says the runner has to beat the ball to first. Technically, a tie goes to the defense.
  4. Hate that myth of the tie going to the runner... It's not true
  5. Surprised Rivera didn't send Encarnacion there to be thrown out by 20 feet. Nice rip by Lawrie
  6. It's something where the intent is good, but the execution and implementation went wrong....
  7. By the letter of the rule, it was legal. Catcher had to move to where he was to catch the ball, and prior to catching the ball, the runner did have a path to the plate (his foot was sort of in the path, but ...). As soon as Sanchez had possession of the ball he can move Into the base runners path if he chooses(which he did). At that point the runner is within his rights to run him over if he wants to. If Sanchez had decided to stay where he was when he caught the ball, the runner would have to avoid contact and slide in to home or just run across.
  8. Yup, and screw these new small stadiums. Should go back to the days where the fences were 500 feet away.
  9. I don't. It's like watching retards try to hump a doorknob
  10. Rivera has been absolutely awful with sending runners this year.
  11. They've got nothing in the minors for Of prospects, they may as well take a flyer on a guy who had even minor success over a tiny time frame in mlb already.
  12. No risk for a team claiming him, he either continues to suck and they do the same thing the jays did, or they might get a few weeks of use out of him while a guy is in the DL.
  13. Pretty sure we just let him have him, something would have been announced by now if there was anything coming back
  14. Well that didn't work out.... Lawrie will go yard here, I can feel it
  15. If they pull him off waivers I'm pretty sure they have to put him back on the roster. They can't just keep running down the list just to keep the player. Once they've made the choice to place him on waivers and he's claimed, only one of three things can happen. He gets traded for something, he gets taken off waivers and placed back on the roster, or they don't work out a trade and just let him go to the claiming team go nothing.
  16. First pitch has been served. Picking locked for tonight.
  17. I see what you're saying, but that was AA's intent the entire time to keep waiting and waiting. When you play the waiting game with FAs, you can't tell them they only have a short time to sign after the offer when you've waited the entire offseason to even make an offer. It holds no weight.
  18. It's not quite that simple. From all reports, Santana had already agreed to sign with the Jays and was practically at the airport to go take his physical when Medlen got hurt and the Braves jumped in and offered basically the same deal that he immediately jumped at and left the Jays hanging. It tells me Santana had literally no other offers except for the Jays and he really didn't want to be there.
×
×
  • Create New...