Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

L54

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    13,254

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

 Content Type 

Profiles

Toronto Blue Jays Videos

2026 Toronto Blue Jays Top Prospect Rankings

Toronto Blue Jays Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Toronto Blue Jays Fan Guides & Resources

2025 Toronto Blue Jays Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Toronto Blue Jays News, Rumors & Analysis

2026 Toronto Blue Jays Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by L54

  1. L54
    Yup seems like the same type scenario we might see with Sanchez.
  2. L54
    Not necessarily. Throwing simulated games or extra bull pens isn't the same as the real game innings they could be getting. Just seems like valuable development time they're missing.
  3. L54
    What kind of damage would it do long term to have a guy out of the pen for the whole year instead of maturing as a SP in aaa? I understand bringing guys like that up in August or September to watch innings. Maybe it's very minimal, but it seems long term they would be better off getting the innings.
  4. L54
    And if you can acquire Peter Forsberg at a discount, you do it.
  5. L54
    Hahaha that might be a more appropriate name Nah, no ill hate towards Goins. Just he isn't served as anything more than a 25th man on this team. I could live with that.
  6. L54
    Haha yup, my bad fellas. Although, I still think it could fit Goins too! Takes me back to the Damon Stoudamire days in TO
  7. L54
    Haha pretty much the perfect name for Goins
  8. L54
    Am I the only one who's really not comfortable with trading anymore prospects? The most valuable prospects are on the cusp of being big league contributors, and the rest of what makes up the Jays farm system seem to be years away and not hold as much value across the league (although Barretto seems to make an exception). Maybe I'm tired and not thinking straight, but a couple more deals (I'm looking at you, Brandon McCarthy and Jed Lowrie) along with putting together a bullpen and this team looks pretty good. I just don't see a scenario where the Jays line up with the Mariners for Saunders that makes sense for both teams. I'd love him (then McCarthy, then Lowrie, in that order), but without a 3rd team not sure how it would get done.
  9. L54
    Absolutely. Basically turned Marcum, a 6th rd pick, a punted pick to save $$ and an IFA into the game's best three bagger. Well done Alex, well done. I don't hate this trade for the A's. It has potential to work out. What I would hate as an A's fan would be the timing. Just seems irrational and with no clear plan.
  10. L54
    Couldn't agree more. Pitchers are some of the oddest people in the world too it seems. They all have their own routines unique to themselves to help them prepare for their start. Just because he's not tossing our former 3B Brett Lawrie alley oops in the clubhouse doesn't mean he's a cancer. If anything, some of those guys (and current guys) could learn a thing or two from the way Dickey approaches his job.
  11. L54
    AA also did a good job selling high on the three prospects, especially Graveman.
  12. L54
    I'm perfectly fine with RA Dickey staying put in Toronto. Especially if AA can kick his side kick Thole, to the curb. Why is it so hard to DFA Josh Thole? His only real value is that Dickey likes him as a catcher, so why would anyone else really want him? Stash him in AAA, only needing him if it turns out Martin can't catch Dickey.
  13. L54
    That's not to say they aren't valuable. That's why building depth and trading from it is a beautiful thing
  14. L54
    Agreed completely
  15. L54
    This is the exact type of trade where giving up prospects doesn't hurt nearly as much. An efficient use of them, not like the Dickey trade. AA putting together another good farm system has paid off.
  16. L54
    Was wondering the same thing
  17. L54
    I don't think you can quantify "throwing in" someone to replace Lawrie and Barretto.
  18. L54
    Completely agree
  19. L54
    This proves one thing. Either AA was forced to go "all in" in 2012 to produce a winner, or he has learned how to efficiently acquire wins and talent. Either way, who gives a f***. Fap.
  20. L54
    This is nucking futs you guys
  21. L54
    People need to stop s***ing their pants because the Red Sox signed Pablo and Hanley.
  22. L54
    Or one has already had major league success in his first full year, one is a top 100 prospect and the other fills a huge hole. These aren't AAAA filler scrubs.
  23. L54
    There's always the possibility he waives his no trade clause. Still not sure what to think. He would look great between Jose and EE on paper.
  24. L54
    Why wouldn't Travis on the depth chart?
  25. L54
    Nobody has claimed Pompey will be a great CF in his first full year. The term "ace" is thrown around too frequently to quantify what an ace really is. I can think of 29 other teams that would love to have Stroman in their rotation. Travis is probably a ~2 win upgrade over the current 2B regime. I anticipate one more signing (Headley or McCarthy please) and at least one trade (Saunders out of SEA but I don't see it happening, plus Navarro should be gone). As long as AA isn't content with the current team, there is reason to believe this team can compete for the WC.
×
×
  • Create New...