I feel like at this point the term on these big FA contracts can essentially be ignored. None of these teams expect the players to be useful in years 9, 10, 11... they just stretch out the deal to keep the AAV down for luxury tax.
Heck they probably don't even model the players out to be useful in years 7 and 8. I bet the models look something like: star for a few years, good for a few more years, then replacement level from 36 onward.
So it helps to translate them to, say, 8 year deals. Say they are:
8/$45M for Judge
8/$43.75M for Correa
8/$37.5M for Turner
8/$35 for Boogers
They kind of make more sense when you think about them like this.
Judge has the most projected WAR. Best chance at immediate superstar impact.
Correa is the youngest, second best projected, and of the shortstops has the most traditional offensive profile with walks and homers.
The relative numbers kind of make sense, and they also kind of make sense in relation to the highest AAV contracts in history coming into this offseason when you think about the new CBA, inflation, etc.