He's interesting
The stuff+ over the last month is actually pretty middling, like 94 stuff+
But the splitter effectively makes him a wide arsenal pitcher who is 50% FB, 25% splitter, 15% slider 10% curveball or something like that
It's also not super common for a SP to throw a splitter that much
Since July 28th here are the SP who have thrown a splitter 20%+ of the time:
Gausman 35% Imanaga 32% Eovaldi 32% Francis 26% Houck 22% Mitchell Parker 21% (Bryce Miller 15% is next).
Six guys.
Comp to sliders, you get 19 guys and then a bunch more who are barely below 20%
AND we kind of know that stuff+ sucks with changeups and splitters. e.g. it has Gausman and Imanaga's splitters as 90 and 80 pitches this year. Both of those are thrown a lot and have positive run values, so that just doesn't make sense.
So if you make some assumptions:
- more pitches is better
- the splitter is a weapon despite what stuff+ says
- he has good command
Then I think he could be pretty damn good as a wide arsenal guy with good command and enough tricks up his sleeve. Some guys in that bucket are:
- Zach Eflin (he might have 5+ pitches though)
- Erick Fedde (cutter, sinker, slider, change)
- Michael King (four seamer, sinker, slider, change)
- Seth Lugo (four seamer, sinker, slider, curveball, plus three other show-me pitches)
- This late career version of Nathan Eovaldi
^ all of the above are good 2024 SP with qualified innings but below average overall stuff+
I guess at the end of the day it could just be the classic baseball developmental touched-by-god leap of "man finds changeup"
The thing we don't really know yet is if he actually has good command. If it comes and goes, he won't be as good as the above. And if the splitter isn't as good as it has seemed recently and hitters catch onto it, then he slides down the spectrum.