Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

Nox

Verified Member
  • Posts

    1,872
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Toronto Blue Jays Videos

2025 Toronto Blue Jays Top Prospects Ranking

Toronto Blue Jays Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Toronto Blue Jays Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Nox

  1. Almost time to retire this narrative. WAR (of which stuff similar to wRC+ is a pillar) is becoming more mainstream every day. It's on broadcasts and on ESPN's player pages.
  2. How are you so bad at posting? Serious question.
  3. Don't worry about these other boobs. I'm listening. Can you expand on your thoughts here a bit?
  4. It's not all about you Darrell.
  5. Understood. Not even criticizing anything. Literally every projection system is going to spit out a few results that your intuition is going to immediately disagree with.
  6. Will definitely take the under on Bautista's wOBA at .408.
  7. Check your private messages for a life-changing opportunity.
  8. Must be a no homerun league.
  9. ~20% of NJH's career likes administered right here in this thread. We're witnessing history here people.
  10. If anything, Aaron Sanchez is the most overrated arm in baseball. A "stuff" guy who can struggle with command needs to miss bats. He does not do that.
  11. Said no legitimate baseball person ever.
  12. The really unfortunate part here is that you're completely serious.
  13. Vin Scully died?
  14. Jesus. I really wish there was an efficient way to short that on a large scale. If that's what the betting market thinks, they're a bunch of f***tards.
  15. People that matter already snicker at him. That's good enough for me.
  16. Fangraphs comments are becoming intolerable. The best public projection system we have doesn't even have him as a top 10 pitcher and JFAs is getting s*** on because he's arguing that he might not be #1? Good grief. f***ing idiots.
  17. Nox

    NHL Thread

    Lmao @ Hockey. Take on ~$7.5 of Matt Hendricks and give up a 3rd round pick for a lateral move from Dubnyk to Ben Scrivens (who only has 1 year of control).
  18. Nox

    NHL Thread

    You almost need a new account for re-posting something from that board, regardless of context. Sadly though, I get the distinct impression that a good number of NHL GM's don't take years of control into account when making decisions.
  19. Another move like that and his Darrell membership is going to subject to review.
  20. Nox

    NHL Thread

    Teasing out the effect of teammates and linemates is a legitimately hard problem. I can't think of any non-bayesian approach that's going to do a respectable job. The analysis I've seen leveraging legit looking hierarchical bayesian models actually highlight some pretty interesting things. (DMen have almost no effect at even strength, thus are being vastly overrated by the market right now). The biggest issue with this stuff though is that you need an ungodly amount of computing power to run the necessary monte carlo sims. (hours per season sim of which there are many in an effective MC)
  21. I feel like you know alot less about this than you think.
  22. We all know Kevin Gray wouldn't like about a thing like this.
  23. Explain exactly why you can't rank players based on a projection system. It seems like you're suggesting that you can't rank things that don't have a deterministic value and that doesn't make sense. A couple of more things: 1) you don't need a projection system at all to understand aging curves. 2) Projections are basically irrelevant in modern risk analysis. The only things that can seriously harm a franchise are things you can't predict.
  24. Again, the point you're trying to make is completely muddled. Steamer's projections are their best guess at ranking players based on talent. Their guess and reality obviously differ but it still represents something more accurate than whatever any of our guts tell us.
  25. Of course it's an estimate. Nobody is saying that it isn't. But what are they estimating? True talent and future performance measures are interchangeable in this regard (before non player specific adjustments are made to the outputs [park effects]).
×
×
  • Create New...