Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

G-Snarls

Community Moderator
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    42,177

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    23

 Content Type 

Profiles

Toronto Blue Jays Videos

2026 Toronto Blue Jays Top Prospects Ranking

Toronto Blue Jays Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Toronto Blue Jays Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Toronto Blue Jays Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by G-Snarls

  1. G-Snarls
    Yep. They were #7 in payroll.
  2. G-Snarls
    I give the Red Sox a pass because, well... they won the WS last year, they have a lot of good young talent that underperformed this year, and they appropriately jettisoned payroll mid season. And I trust their FO to make impact FA signings in the off season. Dodgers keep underperforming every year despite all that money. Hard to explain. Let's hear from the "team chemistry" people Phillies are a disgrace. They had no business keeping all their vets the past 2 years. They are doomed for a decade. Tigers had a good looking team mid season, with one glaring problem (bullpen) and they failed to fix it at the trade deadline. Shame on them. Yankees I cut *some* slack because they were unlucky with injuries to the SP. But they are also too old and not enough offense. The money is no longer covering up the holes well enough but "they tried", if you think that matters
  3. G-Snarls
    A pretty bad year for spending big and going deep in the playoffs Dodgers opening day: $ 241,128,402 - Lost in NLDS Yankees opening day: $ 208,830,659 - Added payroll, did not make post season Phillies opening day:$ 179,521,056 - LOL Tigers opening day: $ 163,078,526 - Added payroll, lost in ALDS Red Sox opening day $ 154,380,395 - Shed payroll, did not make post season Wanted to add end of season payroll but can't seem to find easily... http://www.businessinsider.com/chart-payroll-mlb-playoff-teams-2014-10
  4. G-Snarls
    No biggie Thanks for update
  5. G-Snarls
    OTOH we don't really have the right to troll anyone. Our team blows. LOL
  6. G-Snarls
    Today seems like a good time to troll the Angels board?? Just sayin'. LOL
  7. G-Snarls
    That's actually pretty interesting. Dodgers like their star power but yes have too many overpaid outfielders. That could work on both ends. You're presuming they don't want to keep Hanley Ramirez or that they move him or Reyes from short?
  8. G-Snarls
    Want Nats to tie it up in the bottom
  9. G-Snarls
    Oh snap Belt HR 2-1
  10. G-Snarls
    Great grab Espinosa
  11. G-Snarls
    Close close
  12. G-Snarls
    Getting close to post season record for innings and time here
  13. G-Snarls
    He's too busy making movies http://www.hdwallpapers.in/walls/machete_kills_2013_movie-wide.jpg
  14. G-Snarls
    We already did that. Twice. It was painful. (I know you were being sarcastic)
  15. G-Snarls
    LOL Imagine how different things might have gone if Ricky had remained a legit #2 caliber starter. Would have had so many implications for the team and AA. Prob would not have traded for Josh Johnson or Dickey. So yeah, FU Ricky
  16. G-Snarls
    Yes. In 2016 Ricky Romero will be pitching for the Angels or Dodgers AAA affiliate and will save us 7.5 million dollars. Thank you Ricky.
  17. G-Snarls
    All that said, I think we should keep both, but consider trading one mid season next year IF the kids are working out as hoped.
  18. G-Snarls
    Dickey looked really good this year for most of the season, is guaranteed to eat innings, and is set to make only 12M for 2015 and 2016 (club option with cheap buyout). I think lots of teams would be interested in that. Including many NL teams. Buerhle is no better in terms of.pitching performance, and costs 7M more for one season, then could be extended or qualified. As dependable as Buerhle is, Dickey is a better value.
  19. G-Snarls
    Brilliant idea
  20. G-Snarls
    Did he meet his player option requirements??? *$15,000,000 $15M Player Option player option for 2015 if he 1) has 400 IP in 2013-14, including 190 IP in 2014, and 2) is not on the disabled list at the end of the 2014 season Edit: No he didn't. Not enough IP in 2013. So he's a free agent and can't be qualified. Good target for several teams.
  21. G-Snarls
    AA still wants
  22. G-Snarls
    I blame the Dickey/Thole combo for making Kratz seemingly expendable. They should have jettisoned Thole last year IYAM. Even AA knows that Kratz is better than Thole. And Gibby sure as Hell does.
  23. G-Snarls
    I remember us calling it "Bautista and the Bisons" Very apt
  24. G-Snarls
    Yeah I meant to delete that and just say BP
  25. G-Snarls
    Right It's not good enough to cover the raises for a team that will be the same but a year older Money to SP, BP, 2B and LF might be needed to actually make the team substantially better. Now AA has some salary to shed as well which will help but to really make the team better he needs to add.
×
×
  • Create New...