Hahaha, probably not. I just think that when one player on a team is so much better than everyone else on it, WAR might underestimate their contribution. This could obviously apply to Trout too, but his team has so many flaws that losing him might have less of an impact. Am I right or wrong? Don't know, it's impossible to say. Obviously I'm of the opinion that the team around you matters to who you deem "most valuable", and many people don't feel that way. Best player vs most valuable player are subtly different. All that said? I'd take either player in a heartbeat, and probably Trout first, if I was building team from scratch. I just think that on their teams, removing Cabrera from the Tigers is more devastating than removing Trout from the Angels.