Actually, rather than just dismissing this, I'd actually like to take a look at this.
Why the f*** even bring this up? Not only is it insanely stupid to look at such a small sample size, not only is it dumn to think that an average player's absence can have this much impact in the game of baseball, but it isn't even supporting your point. And then the double negative in your last sentence made my eyes f***ing bleed.
All in all, 2/10, jimmies = rustled.