Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted
Nobody should wear a suit jacket with shorts. It looks ridiculous. But yes, the shoes that don't match anything he's wearing makes it even worse. Just screaming for attention because he's so self conscious. I feel bad for the guy.

 

Brownie coming in HOT

  • Replies 15.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
I’d totally wear that jacket and shorts…it’s the shoes that really f*** up that look.

 

To each their own but I wouldn’t wear that unless I was trying to win the Worst Dressed World Championship

Posted
Oh I took it in the sense the Jays would get a bigger return since there was way less $ left on the deal if they were to trade him. Speaking of luxury tax if a team releases a player does a players contract count against the tax?

 

If the Jays are up against it next offseason it might make sense to attach money and trade Springer just to get rid of the cost against the tax.

 

That was my point. Although your suggestion also works (just give them $$$ in the trade to increase his value). I don't know how that works v. the luxury tax. In my scenario, if you signed him for 8 years $180M, the AAV for luxury tax is $22.5M annually. If you paid him $100M in the first 2 years, then traded him - would the team receiving him have to pay him 6 years $80M in real money ($13.3M AAV), but would $22.5M go against their luxury tax calcs? I never thought that far down the line.

Posted
I’d totally wear that jacket and shorts…it’s the shoes that really f*** up that look.

 

While that outfit isn’t for me, flamboyant looks are common for those type of ethnic groups. It’s the shoes that are inexcusable, as you said. Looks like a chicks shoes

Posted
While that outfit isn’t for me, flamboyant looks are common for those type of ethnic groups. It’s the shoes that are inexcusable, as you said. Looks like a chicks shoes

 

Ethnic groups?

Posted
Ethnic groups?

 

What did he mean by ethnic groups? I come on this message board to get away from all the racism and here this guy goes.

 

Joking :)

Posted
You realize the 40 man roster includes the MLB roster right? The MLB roster that won 89 games last season? Not many "minor league teams" win 89 games in the major leagues you f***ing nitwit.

 

f***ing amazing that people without even two brain cells to rub together can muster the ability to log on here.

 

Thank you 🙏

Posted
I wouldn’t accept Trout for free. Terrible idea

 

Not if LA eats 1/3 of the salary and you play him 70-80% in LF and rest at DH

Posted
Not if LA eats 1/3 of the salary and you play him 70-80% in LF and rest at DH

He has averaged 72 games the last 4 seasons and is trending down big time. No, I wouldn’t take him for free at 2/3rds of his salary

Posted
Reports of jays being interested in JDM. He’d be a great addition.

 

He would be my #1 priority right now

Posted
I remain confused why his projected salary is so low

 

How many teams need a DH that cannot field at all.

Community Moderator
Posted
I remain confused why his projected salary is so low

 

He is an old right handed DH

Posted
He would be my #1 priority right now

 

Hell yeah. He's an upgrade on Belt and you don't have to hide him from lefties. Instant oomph to the lineup at a comparatively reasonable cost and we have DH open. Looks like $40M over 2 years is the consensus take?

Posted
He would be my #1 priority right now

 

There are some cracks in the armor man. I know it's only 1 year, but I can't see this being priority #1.

Posted
He has averaged 72 games the last 4 seasons and is trending down big time. No, I wouldn’t take him for free at 2/3rds of his salary

 

Yeah, the wear and tear and the injuries the last few years make it tough - there's so much downside here in his age 32 season. But at the same time, he's Mike f***in Trout and it wouldn't surprise me if he puts up a 6-7 WAR MVP season this season. It would be tempting as hell, but you'd probably regret it.

Posted
Having trout on the team will just pay for itself in marketing dollars. Everyone will want to see the former best player in the league play.
Posted
Having trout on the team will just pay for itself in marketing dollars. Everyone will want to see the former best player in the league play.

 

No it wouldn’t and no they don’t

Posted
JD Martinez L54? Gimmie Belt or Votto over him. Would have took Rowdy as well. Don't make Vlad play 160 games at first base and make our lineup Right handed heavy and one dimensional. Id rather DH Winker or Brantley over him but would love to get Votto on this team.
Posted
Lol @ wouldnt take Trout for free. Got f***ers talking about paying 200M for Bellinger but wouldn't want Trout for free lol.
Posted
Hell yeah. He's an upgrade on Belt and you don't have to hide him from lefties. Instant oomph to the lineup at a comparatively reasonable cost and we have DH open. Looks like $40M over 2 years is the consensus take?

 

Not sure Id want to go that high but you’re right he adds a dimension to the lineup nobody else currently does unless Vlad decides to stop hitting everything on the ground

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Blue Jays community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...