Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

GDT: Toronto Blue Jays (9-12) @ Oakland Athletics (11-11) - 2/3: 4:07 PM ET


Recommended Posts

Posted
Why bunt if you're not going to be aggressive on the basepaths afterward? That Galvis fly ball seemed deep enough.

 

It was a a shallow pop up. He would have been DOA.

  • Replies 197
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
And they'll all say it "worked" 'cause we got one run. But Maile has the ability to shoot a double into the gap and score 2 with no outs... So, I mean, yay that we're winning, but boo that we wasted an out.

 

Dude what the f*** are you talking about? Luke Maile is an awful hitter. I have the ability to shoot a double into the gap too but that doesn't mean it's likely that I will.

Posted
Dude what the f*** are you talking about? Luke Maile is an awful hitter. I have the ability to shoot a double into the gap too but that doesn't mean it's likely that I will.

 

I'm not saying he's good, I'm saying he's more likely to create positive production by swinging away than he is by giving up an out.

Posted
I'm not saying he's good, I'm saying he's more likely to create positive production by swinging away than he is by giving up an out.

 

I quite strongly disagree, and I'm not even defending the bunt here. Luke Maile most likely strikes out or hits a weak flyball in that scenario, considering the type of pitcher that Mike Fiers is. He is not a good hitter.

Posted

Dude is throwing curveballs that bounce in the dirt. Rather have a runner on 3rd and put pressure and get in the head of the pitcher and catcher.

 

Sogards single would not have/did not score a runner on 2b.

Posted
I quite strongly disagree, and I'm not even defending the bunt here. Luke Maile most likely strikes out or hits a weak flyball in that scenario, considering the type of pitcher that Mike Fiers is.

 

He's been a slightly below average hitter by wRC+ in the past 2 years, sure he's not great, but he's not as bad as you're making him out to be. Having him bunt there probably created a worse result than having him swing away.

Posted
Is it time to trade Shoemaker?

 

He's good now, but regression could eat him alive

 

Well, not now...

 

f*** this ********.

Posted
He's been a slightly below average hitter by wRC+ in the past 2 years, sure he's not great, but he's not as bad as you're making him out to be. Having him bunt there probably created a worse result than having him swing away.

 

He was a 90 wRC+ hitter on the back of a .350 BABIP, I don't know about you but I don't see Luke as having the elite exit velocity or bat control - not to mention lack of speed - to see him continue to do that in the future. The projections rightfully view him as a very bad hitter, and bad hitters, one who strike out a lot like in his case, are not good bets to get something productive done in that scenario. Montoyo went with the high probability for him to advance the runners over the lower probability option of him reaching base or having a slow dribbler for the same result. It's probably not nearly as bad of a call as you think it is.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Blue Jays community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...