Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

Bringer of Rain Elite Dynasty - - bjmbleagues.com


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 28k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • BTS

    4186

  • Spanky99

    3157

  • Dr. Dinger

    2554

  • Boxcar

    1528

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Here come the excuses.

 

I feel your pain BTS. I'm having awful weeks everywhere other than the DDL.

 

Actually I just missed Harvey's start in BORED.

 

Don't get bitter because Kemp knows when the games matter and Bird doesn't

Community Moderator
Posted
How's it feel to be down 14-0 to a pair of drunks. While also owning Trout.

 

Not very good :(

Posted
I love it when a plan comes together this perfectly.

 

I think we like Freeland going forward, although I didn't trust him against the Dodgers in Coors and he pitches a really good game, whilst Liriano was a Christmas tree, 'tis is beisbol.

Posted

Went to add Senzatella, but I see that 'PriceisWrongBitch' already picked him up.

Only problem with that is that he's on my minor league roster.

 

Also, they used him in the game today, which was illegal.

Posted (edited)
Went to add Senzatella, but I see that 'PriceisWrongBitch' already picked him up.

Only problem with that is that he's on my minor league roster.

 

Also, they used him in the game today, which was illegal.

 

Ruh-Roh... how can jaysblue make such a bonehead mistake.

 

Senzatella pitched 5 shutout innings with 6 K's to a 2.00 K/BB and a .300 OBPA

 

What's the next step, penalty?

Edited by Spanky99
Posted
Ruh-Roh... how can jaysblue make such a bonehead mistake.

 

Senzatella pitched 5 shutout innings with 6 K's to a 2.00 K/BB and a .300 OBPA

 

What's the next step, penalty?

 

I suggest his opponent gets to choose one of PIWB's remaining starters, and PWIB has to sit him out, and miss his start.

Unless there's a way for a commissioner to just remove those stats.

Community Moderator
Posted
I suggest his opponent gets to choose one of PIWB's remaining starters, and PWIB has to sit him out, and miss his start.

Unless there's a way for a commissioner to just remove those stats.

 

In Yahoo? lol

Posted
I suggest his opponent gets to choose one of PIWB's remaining starters, and PWIB has to sit him out, and miss his start.

Unless there's a way for a commissioner to just remove those stats.

 

So that would be Bumgarner, lol. We'll see what Spittin and BTS come up with.

Posted
I suggest his opponent gets to choose one of PIWB's remaining starters, and PWIB has to sit him out, and miss his start.

Unless there's a way for a commissioner to just remove those stats.

 

I like that idea.

Community Moderator
Posted
Probably should lose a draft pick for that. Amateur hour.

 

Announcement coming. We absolutely can't have matchups altered by illegal adds because people don't bother to check the sheet.

Community Moderator
Posted
So we've decided that L54 will get to choose a starter of jaysblue's to sit this weekend (will be Bumgarner if he doesn't choose one), and jaysblue will be fined Dinger's 1st round MiLB pick in 2017.
Posted
So we've decided that L54 will get to choose a starter of jaysblue's to sit this weekend (will be Bumgarner if he doesn't choose one), and jaysblue will be fined Dinger's 1st round MiLB pick in 2017.

 

I really like the message it sends, but I wonder if it might have been better to wait and see if it ended up affecting the matchup before penalizing such a high pick.

Posted

I think it's too severe of a penalty. It's tougher in Yahoo than FanTrax to know who is owned, and we don't always have access to the spreadsheets at work, or on the phone etc. I think it's an easy mistake to do. And it's not like Senzatella was a top prospect.

 

At least make it a second round pick. If he doesn't own one, give him a chance to trade for one.

Community Moderator
Posted

Yeah kind of seems a bit harsh. Risks having him rage quit the league.

 

I agree that simply sitting a starter is not enough - adding an owned prospect and collecting their stats brings the reputation of the league into disrepute and there needs to be a deterrent.

 

However, adding an owned prospect is an easy mistake to make. I did it in the DDL last week (of course, I noticed right away and dropped the guy).

 

I think you should decrease the penalty pick a bit. But it's none of my business.

Posted
I too agree that a first is too harsh... he had him on his roster since the 2nd though, he still should've made sure he wasn't owned. On 2nd thought, is he still in Asia? He left on the 23rd of March right, and said he was going for 6/8 weeks, so yeah, he's overseas with sketchy internet, I believe this is far too harsh.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Blue Jays community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...