G-Snarls Community Moderator Posted December 22, 2015 Posted December 22, 2015 Is there a convincing argument that Leake is better than Estrada? I don't see one. He's 4 years younger?? I dunno
DuckDuckGose Verified Member Posted December 22, 2015 Posted December 22, 2015 Is there a convincing argument that Leake is better than Estrada? I don't see one. Leake throws it harder, gets more ground balls, throws more innings. and projection systems have him as being better. Leake is 28yo and Estrada is 32yo.
xposbrad Verified Member Posted December 22, 2015 Posted December 22, 2015 In the last 3 years, which pitcher has provided more WAR and is younger?
Sammy225 Old-Timey Member Posted December 22, 2015 Posted December 22, 2015 Is there a convincing argument that Leake is better than Estrada? I don't see one. I think Leake might be only slightly better and younger but for the price it does not make any sense.
DuckDuckGose Verified Member Posted December 22, 2015 Posted December 22, 2015 In the last 3 years, which pitcher has provided more WAR and is younger? That's exactly it. People forget that you don't get paid in FA for what you are going to do you get paid for what you've already accomplished. And Leake has been better despite being younger.
CJ-Freeway Old-Timey Member Posted December 22, 2015 Posted December 22, 2015 I just don't get it. He is not going to more then a 2 WAR player and he is getting 5/80..... No wonder Boras is looking for 5 years for Chen He's probably gonna get it in this market
G-Snarls Community Moderator Posted December 22, 2015 Posted December 22, 2015 That's exactly it. People forget that you don't get paid in FA for what you are going to do you get paid for what you've already accomplished. And Leake has been better despite being younger. Smart front offices like the Cardinals usually avoid doing this though Bad ones like the Phillies did it all the time
BTS Community Moderator Posted December 22, 2015 Posted December 22, 2015 I don't really see Leake's age as a positive over Estrada. If Estrada being older is the difference between a 2-year deal and a 5-year deal, I'll take the older guy. You don't want to be locked into a back end starter for 5 years.
Atothe Old-Timey Member Posted December 22, 2015 Posted December 22, 2015 I don't really see Leake's age as a positive over Estrada. If Estrada being older is the difference between a 2-year deal and a 5-year deal, I'll take the older guy. You don't want to be locked into a back end starter for 5 years. Smart org make dumb choices here and there. Let find out their reasoning before we kill them for it. They deserve that.
DuckDuckGose Verified Member Posted December 22, 2015 Posted December 22, 2015 Smart front offices like the Cardinals usually avoid doing this though Bad ones like the Phillies did it all the time It's just the way FA works but I'd agree that good FO's avoid bad deals especially long ones. I don't mind the AAV; $8M per win (and have a team friendly option at the end) seems about right but 5yrs is a too much for a mid-rotation pitcher.
DuckDuckGose Verified Member Posted December 22, 2015 Posted December 22, 2015 I don't really see Leake's age as a positive over Estrada. If Estrada being older is the difference between a 2-year deal and a 5-year deal, I'll take the older guy. You don't want to be locked into a back end starter for 5 years. Agreed, they should put up similar numbers and flexibility in a couple years > then a few extra innings.
dineke Old-Timey Member Posted December 22, 2015 Posted December 22, 2015 Smart org make dumb choices here and there. Let find out their reasoning before we kill them for it. They deserve that. Same org that traded a top 10 CF for BP junk!
G-Snarls Community Moderator Posted December 22, 2015 Posted December 22, 2015 Jon Heyman @JonHeymanCBS 4m4 minutes ago Manhattan, NY leake had discussions with teams about doing 3 yr-deal at $20M per w/opt-outs after each year before agreeing to 80/5
DuckDuckGose Verified Member Posted December 22, 2015 Posted December 22, 2015 $20M per? Now that's crazy.
Grant77 Old-Timey Member Posted December 22, 2015 Posted December 22, 2015 Jon Heyman @JonHeymanCBS 4m4 minutes ago Manhattan, NY leake had discussions with teams about doing 3 yr-deal at $20M per w/opt-outs after each year before agreeing to 80/5 It's perplexing that a team would be willing to commit 20 mil to a pitcher who hasn't been worth that amount a single time in his entire 6 year career and had his worst full season K and BB rates in 2015.
G-Snarls Community Moderator Posted December 22, 2015 Posted December 22, 2015 Smart org make dumb choices here and there. Let find out their reasoning before we kill them for it. They deserve that. Not everyone hates it
G-Snarls Community Moderator Posted December 22, 2015 Posted December 22, 2015 It's perplexing that a team would be willing to commit 20 mil to a pitcher who hasn't been worth that amount a single time in his entire 6 year career and had his worst full season K and BB rates in 2015. Seriously though I'd rather sign Cueto for that AAV and more years
xposbrad Verified Member Posted December 22, 2015 Posted December 22, 2015 I don't really see Leake's age as a positive over Estrada. If Estrada being older is the difference between a 2-year deal and a 5-year deal, I'll take the older guy. You don't want to be locked into a back end starter for 5 years. Would you take Leake over Estrada/Happ/Dickey?
BTS Community Moderator Posted December 22, 2015 Posted December 22, 2015 Would you take Leake over Estrada/Happ/Dickey? Contracts considered? No. Ignoring contracts I'd take him over Dickey.
Grant77 Old-Timey Member Posted December 22, 2015 Posted December 22, 2015 Would you take Leake over Estrada/Happ/Dickey? Not without giving it some serious thought. I can see an argument either way and I'd bet at least one of them is better in 2016.
THANOS Old-Timey Member Posted December 22, 2015 Posted December 22, 2015 Would you take Leake over Estrada/Happ/Dickey? I wouldn't. The floors are similar but the ceilings and value lie with our 3. Leake over Dickey without contracts in the reasoning though.
G-Snarls Community Moderator Posted December 22, 2015 Posted December 22, 2015 Same org that traded a top 10 CF for BP junk! And, um, won the World Series that year (NB - I know you were being sarcastic)
burlingtonbandit Old-Timey Member Posted December 22, 2015 Posted December 22, 2015 Wonder if this means Buehrle is going to retire. I thought he would sign with the Cardinals for like 1/10 leaving both sides very happy.
G-Snarls Community Moderator Posted December 22, 2015 Posted December 22, 2015 Wonder if this means Buehrle is going to retire. I thought he would sign with the Cardinals for like 1/10 leaving both sides very happy. I thought he'd already decided he was retiring for sure
HERPDERP Old-Timey Member Posted December 22, 2015 Posted December 22, 2015 I thought he'd already decided he was retiring for sure he would have filed his papers if he was for sure.
King Old-Timey Member Posted December 22, 2015 Posted December 22, 2015 Not everyone hates it Keith Law is dumb though
G-Snarls Community Moderator Posted December 22, 2015 Posted December 22, 2015 http://www.tsn.ca/smoltz-replaces-reynolds-verducci-in-booth-1.413116 FOX TV: Smoltz in, Harold Reynolds and Tom Verducci out
G-Snarls Community Moderator Posted December 22, 2015 Posted December 22, 2015 Fox is Racist LMAO Uh huh
G-Snarls Community Moderator Posted December 22, 2015 Posted December 22, 2015 Because Reynolds wasn't terrible at his job or anything (NB - I know you're being sarcastic)
Johnny King Vancouver Canadians - A+ LHP The 19-year-old top prospect has made 16 High-A starts. He is 3-2 with a 2.92 ERA. In 61 2/3 innings, he's walked 35, but he's struck out 83 batters. Explore Johnny King News >
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now