Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted
I think I would trade Hutchison in the off-season if he fetches something good. Gibbons has destroyed him with this season's high workload coming off Tommy John. If you could combine him and Sanchez to get an ace (Hamels?), do it.
  • Replies 235
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Keep Stroman & Hutch, maybe Norris & Lawrie.

 

 

Everyone else gets new Jerseys

 

http://s27.postimg.org/5m0zvieir/jays_for_sale.jpg

Posted
I really like Stroman, but if he has a strong finish to the season they should consider dealing him for someone more established. Like you said this is if they can actually add to payroll.

 

Unfortunately the Jays aren't as committed financially as a bunch of other teams, so a move like this would set us back.

 

Eg. I'd rather keep Stroman and throw a 7/140m contract at Maeda, than trade Stroman for a guy making 15-20m per.

 

You see what you have there? Two assets making similar money to one.

Posted
Keep Stroman & Hutch, maybe Norris & Lawrie.

 

 

Everyone else gets new Jerseys

 

http://s27.postimg.org/5m0zvieir/jays_for_sale.jpg

 

No. Edwin is on such a deal of a contract. He is irreplaceable for that money or anywhere near it. AA would trade away only is he was tearing the whole thing down, which (rightly or wrongly) he is not. He is not trading Edwin for prospects at this point.

Posted
No. Edwin is on such a deal of a contract. He is irreplaceable for that money or anywhere near it. AA would trade away only is he was tearing the whole thing down, which (rightly or wrongly) he is not. He is not trading Edwin for prospects at this point.

 

I cant see any package that makes trading Edwin away make any sense with that now proven production at that price through 2016.

 

Unless its a scorched earth rebuild for top prospects and middle road MLB talent to fill the holes it would make for now, but we are in a half pregnant organizational strategy at present so that won't happen....yet.

 

After being so optimistic this season(apparently overly) I now see pain ahead...with the only real bright spot being potential young arms developing.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
I really like Stroman, but if he has a strong finish to the season they should consider dealing him for someone more established. Like you said this is if they can actually add to payroll.

 

Why in the f*** would this be a good idea? Stroman has already contributed 2+ WAR. That means he's having as good of a season as guys that are more established (like Yovanni Gallardo, Justin Verlander, Matt Garza, Ervin Santana, John Lackey), for a fraction of the cost - and in about half the innings pitched.

 

I'm really glad you're not the one being paid to make these decisions.

Posted
No. Edwin is on such a deal of a contract. He is irreplaceable for that money or anywhere near it. AA would trade away only is he was tearing the whole thing down, which (rightly or wrongly) he is not. He is not trading Edwin for prospects at this point.

 

He is on a great contract, but if the team doesn't look like a contender with him and Bautista, wouldn't it make sense to cash in on his great contract for players that could help in the future? The Jays are in a very familiar spot post-1993, and that's on a treadmill. They need to either trade prospects for vets in order to win (as they won't sign anyone) or scale back. Anything in between (i.e. this past off-season) will only result in an 80-85 win season and no playoff appearance.

Posted
I think Simmons will end up wrong...again. I think this new guy at Rogers will make changes. 5 years is enough time. Took on lots of money and the results didn't follow, I think AA will be fired.
Posted
He is on a great contract, but if the team doesn't look like a contender with him and Bautista, wouldn't it make sense to cash in on his great contract for players that could help in the future? The Jays are in a very familiar spot post-1993, and that's on a treadmill. They need to either trade prospects for vets in order to win (as they won't sign anyone) or scale back. Anything in between (i.e. this past off-season) will only result in an 80-85 win season and no playoff appearance.

 

There is no rush...if they bomb coming out of gate next year Edwin and/or Jose can be moved with buying team control for 1.33 years or more. That's still enticing for a good haul if they are having decent years.

 

If a miracle happens and we are truly contending they swing away...for us.

Community Moderator
Posted
I'm not going to pretend to know much of anything about the way Rogers does business, but under their ownership, the Raptors and this offseason the Leafs seem to be acquiring excellent front-office personnel. Can you folks more in tune with the Toronto sports scene shed light on the possibility that whoever is in charge of running the Leafs and Raptors businesses might also work some magic with the Jays? Or are the Jays completely unrelated?
Old-Timey Member
Posted
I'm not going to pretend to know much of anything about the way Rogers does business, but under their ownership, the Raptors and this offseason the Leafs seem to be acquiring excellent front-office personnel. Can you folks more in tune with the Toronto sports scene shed light on the possibility that whoever is in charge of running the Leafs and Raptors businesses might also work some magic with the Jays? Or are the Jays completely unrelated?

 

timleiweke.jpg

 

MLSE's president is behind that. Doesn't affect the Jays in the least. There is no hope.

Community Moderator
Posted
timleiweke.jpg

 

MLSE's president is behind that. Doesn't affect the Jays in the least. There is no hope.

 

Right. So there's no chance Leiweke gets involved in the search for the Jays' next president?

Posted
Right. So there's no chance Leiweke gets involved in the search for the Jays' next president?

 

Nope. Leiweke works for MLSE which Rogers owns a % of. He is also most likely going to be leaving in the next year.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Nope. Leiweke works for MLSE which Rogers owns a % of. He is also most likely going to be leaving in the next year.

 

At this point, that's just hearsay.

Community Moderator
Posted
Nope. Leiweke works for MLSE which Rogers owns a % of. He is also most likely going to be leaving in the next year.

 

Why? As someone who hates the Leafs, this pleases me.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Right. So there's no chance Leiweke gets involved in the search for the Jays' next president?

 

If they did, it would be a consulting outside of the job description favor. Which would be a good idea and something I could see happening in terms of plausibility, but it's highly unlikely and he has no obligation to.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Why? As someone who hates the Leafs, this pleases me.

 

It probably isn't actually happening. Don't worry. Plus, we already have Shannaban and Ujiri so the ground is set to watch the Sens fail for years to come.

Posted
Why? As someone who hates the Leafs, this pleases me.

 

Word is he doesn't like living here and maybe doesn't like the job

Community Moderator
Posted
It probably isn't actually happening. Don't worry. Plus, we already have Shannaban and Ujiri so the ground is set to watch the Sens fail for years to come.

 

I'm probably a Buffalo fan now if anything. I've always liked Tim Murray, and have Sam Reinhart on both my hockey leagues.

Posted
Why? As someone who hates the Leafs, this pleases me.

 

Apparently he could have something else lined up and is rumored that his family hates the weather in Toronto. Or that he wants a new "challenge". Of the 3 sports teams he oversees the Leafs probably have benefited the least from him as Shanahan has been the guy hiring all the analytic guys.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
I'm probably a Buffalo fan now if anything. I've always liked Tim Murray, and have Sam Reinhart on both my hockey leagues.

 

You disgust me.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
I'm probably a Buffalo fan now if anything. I've always liked Tim Murray, and have Sam Reinhart on both my hockey leagues.

 

Jokes?

Posted
It probably isn't actually happening. Don't worry. Plus, we already have Shannaban and Ujiri so the ground is set to watch the Sens fail for years to come.

 

Sens won;t go anywhere with an Owner that has the smallest payroll in the league and management that doesn't operate in a way to be competitive with a low payroll. They just signed a number 8 Dman to a 3/3.3 contract.

Posted

I thought this board was started for rational baseball discussion? Not f***ing retards. Some of the things I've read in this thread are incredible. Some of you guys want the perfect team with the perfect GM, which is obviously a fantasy. AA doesn't deserve to be fired, at least not yet anyway. Everyone sucked this guys cock when he first came on board, hoarding assets, cutting fat from the roster, etc. He was doing a re-build better than the textbook.

 

The problem/blessing is that something happened to AA that basically never happens to any GM; he won the lottery, twice.

 

Two bench players turned into premier power hitters out of the blue, giving him a fairly impressive core to build from. When AA was presented with a massive trade that 99% of GM's would've pulled the trigger on (if it was financially feasible) he pulled it hard. Because that's what GM's are supposed to do; win right now. If you think the team wasn't at the very least improved on paper than you're delusional. He used assets that he collected over his first few years and traded them for proven major league talent.

 

Now, I think I was one of the most hesitant people here. Yeah, it was really exciting and something I wasn't used too, but I was still hesitant. The year was of course was a disaster as injuries and down years from almost every player happened all at once. Is that AA's fault?

 

All of a sudden we have an aging team with declining players and everyone sucks and yadda-yadda.

 

I was disappointed no one was acquired in the off-season like every fan of every team is, but I understand that the Jays aren't in a trade "talent for talent" situation. However; it is ridiculous that AA couldn't beef up the bench, can't really defend that. But as far as bringing in an impact 2B? Long shot. There's also the fact that players might turn down Toronto. Just because you offer a deal, doesn't mean they're on their way and I can't believe I even have to verbalize that.

 

The deadline this year? I found it absolutely absurd that the Blue Jays couldn't acquire Martin Prado. I heard cries that it would "take AB's away from Lawrie." in which I would say "Good." Lawrie is an excellent defender but is very overrated in general. I can't stand when people lump him in with the best players on the team, "Oh, wait until Lind and Lawrie come back." What? You mean the guy with the .700 ops? Sounds like maybe some politics in upper management, or maybe they simply didn't have the funds to get Prado. Either way, I was very disappointed.

 

But to s*** on Hutch in his first full season? If the guy starts 30 games and posts an ERA under 4.50 we should be happy, if Stroman and Sanchez can finish the year strong, we should be happy. The biggest issue that plagued this organization for 2 decades was its absolute futility in drafting starting pitchers and with AA we have 3 on the same team, contributing. I'm not an AA apologist by any means but I am reasonable. To me, AA will last as long as Bautista and it's fitting as his emergence has totally shaped his tenure.

 

Don't hate on the kids, don't hate the GM, but give s*** to the leaders on the field, to the guys counted on winning games. Hearing these guys deflecting blame or finding excuses is unacceptable and it infuriates me. "Now you know what Bautista was talking about." STFU and play baseball. If the team, which is supposed to be good, continues to suck, then yes...the circle of life continues and management falls.

 

Besides, what would a replacement do? "Wow, we have a lot of good pieces here." (Acquires Johnny Gomes).

 

/end rant

Posted (edited)
Chances are Jays will stumble out of gate next year, doubt he will make much improvement over winter, which should take care of Anthopoulos and Co. Edited by GNick49

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Blue Jays community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...