Abomination Old-Timey Member Posted December 21, 2013 Posted December 21, 2013 I believe he meant under 4. Unless I'm reading it wrong, it doesn't fit with the rest of his statement. I think his phone is screwing up the columns on Fangraphs. edited to say: Never mind, I think I see what he's saying now. Very confusing, but the misunderstanding was on my end.
G-Snarls Community Moderator Posted December 21, 2013 Posted December 21, 2013 IMO the error bars on Rasmus' projection are much, much bigger than those for Lee's. I'd be shocked if Lee puts up 1-2 WAR next year and not even remotely surprised id Rasmus does. YTeah, given Colby's inconsistency you can't help but be afraid he could have a crap season at any time Lee has been as steady as it gets
Abomination Old-Timey Member Posted December 21, 2013 Posted December 21, 2013 IMO the error bars on Rasmus' projection are much, much bigger than those for Lee's. I'd be shocked if Lee puts up 1-2 WAR next year and not even remotely surprised id Rasmus does. Yeah, I agree. I really am in favor of trading Rasmus this off-season.
Cooler Heads Prevail Verified Member Posted December 21, 2013 Posted December 21, 2013 YTeah, given Colby's inconsistency you can't help but be afraid he could have a crap season at any time Lee has been as steady as it gets I'm not liking Colby as a long term expensive piece on this team so I'd look to move him. If it means we keep Bautista on his nice contract even better. Moving JPA and Colby off the team might make us less of a swing for the fences, high strikeout team in some games. Nothing against Colby he has value but the contract issue and the fact we might have to pony up for pitching is a factor. Lee is one of the few veteran gambles we could acquire with the kind of ceiling that might make a difference.
DuckDuckGose Verified Member Posted December 22, 2013 Posted December 22, 2013 No pitcher should really be projected for over 175 IP, you can't expect that many innings. He's never been healthy and not thrown +200 IP. I understand what you're saying JFaS but if Lee is healthy he'll be around 220IP again.
DuckDuckGose Verified Member Posted December 22, 2013 Posted December 22, 2013 If you think Lee hasn't had 4 WAR in a season since 2006, either Fangraphs isn't working well on your phone or you're getting the xFIP column confused with the WAR column. I said healthy season. He was hurt in '07 and put up 2.7 or something in '06. Nvm we were saying the same thing.
DuckDuckGose Verified Member Posted December 22, 2013 Posted December 22, 2013 He's saying that you don't project him to start 33 games. I get the concept. FWIW Steamer is also projecting Buehrle at 192IP as well.
connorp Old-Timey Member Posted December 22, 2013 Posted December 22, 2013 Pretty much. I know you're being sarcastic, but it's true. This ties into my yesterday rant but seriously..I think if all the books in Las Vegas decided they would hire some of best math minds around the world to look at baseball so they can generate projections and establish O/U for things like WAR..I bet you would see a far superior machine as the comp process would be much more precise based on the individuals. It would not be lazy system that doesnt differentiate apples from oranges.
Frenchsoup Verified Member Posted March 3, 2014 Author Posted March 3, 2014 Trade doesn't look to bad today eh boys?
Nox Verified Member Posted March 3, 2014 Posted March 3, 2014 "If he stays healthy" is not really a useful qualifier when determining pitcher value going forward.
G-Snarls Community Moderator Posted March 3, 2014 Posted March 3, 2014 Trade doesn't look to bad today eh boys? LOL no. Don't know what they should do at this point. Feels pretty hopeless.
JoJo Parker Dunedin Blue Jays - A SS On Tuesday, Parker was just 1-for-5, but the one hit was his first professional home run. Explore JoJo Parker News >
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now