Which baseball Legend would you want?

[TBJ12]

This was a legit poll and better than 90% of the garbage I see on this board. baseballsss is right nothing but a bunch of butt hurts around here. If you don't like the thread don't post in it, this site is just as bad as the old board was.

 

I'd take Ruth and it's not even close.

[GD]

this site is just as bad as the old board was.

 

Are you high?

[Cooler Heads Prevail]

Well, I'd venture to say that if you plucked any one of these guys them straight out of 1940 or whatever, would really touch modern pitching. Nobody actually threw hard back then despite all the urban legend ********. They were all a bunch of non athletes by today's standards. Put Trout/Stanton in 1940 and they'd probably wRC+ 300.

 

Biggest bunch of bull I've read in some time. Take any of these guys, give them access to modern facilities and trainers and they'd be superstars any era.

[Boxcar]

Biggest bunch of bull I've read in some time. Take any of these guys, give them access to modern equipment, trainers, the gym and they'd be superstars any era.

 

So you don't read your own posts?

[Cooler Heads Prevail]

"Romero in 2012 and Johnson in 2013 have the same stats!"

 

"Profars a bust because he has .230 batting average in limited time!"

 

"Brett Lawrie is our best prospect!"

 

etc..etc...etc

 

A more intelligent person would understand how to quote people and not project their own ideas into paraphrased one liners. But its pretty obvious

you aren't intelligent, you post absolute s*** dozens of times a day. You seem mentally unstable to me, if I am perfectly honest.

[Angrioter]

"Romero in 2012 and Johnson in 2013 have the same stats!"

 

"Profars a bust because he has .230 batting average in limited time!"

 

"Brett Lawrie is our best prospect!"

 

etc..etc...etc

 

Strawman

[Nox]

Biggest bunch of bull I've read in some time. Take any of these guys, give them access to modern facilities and trainers and they'd be superstars any era.

 

The complete lack of nutrition/training for the old guys is exactly what I was referring to. So attempting to nullify that point is pretty stupid.