Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Verified Member
Posted

On a non-draft related note, I'm looking at shopping Howard/Cuddyer. If anyone is interested, lemme know.

 

Not exactly sure what I am looking for. Probably a SP/Closer/Picks/Prospects, or some combination depending on what is being offered. Lemme know if interested.

Posted

I have a rules question:

 

At what point do picks with expired windows expire? I have the 98th pick. How long after my window expiring would I be forced to pick, or else give up the pick entirely? A week?

Posted
If you still haven't made a pick a week after your window expires, you better be in ICU or you're kicked out of the league.

So it's a judgement call made by the Darrells then, no strict deadline?

 

Not trying to be difficult btw.

Posted
As soon as the last window expires, we'll open up FA, so it's a moot point. If you think you're going to sit on pick 98 for a week while everyone else's rosters are finalized in the hopes of grabbing someone who becomes relevant late in Spring Training, it's not going to happen.
Community Moderator
Posted
I have a rules question:

 

At what point do picks with expired windows expire? I have the 98th pick. How long after my window expiring would I be forced to pick, or else give up the pick entirely? A week?

 

Specifically because you asked, twenty four hours. Pick 98 will disappear in 24 hours if you haven't picked someone.

 

And as dinger said, moot point. Free agency is open at some time shortly after the last person picks anyway.

 

I'm thinking midnight after the last person makes their waiver pick, everyone can start adding dudes if they want. I might not bother putting every free agent on waivers.

Posted

Okay, that makes sense.

 

One more question: What is the definition of "played" as it pertains to a prospect having played at AA or higher (and then becoming eligible for MLB rosters)?

 

Does it apply the second a prospect steps onto a AA or higher field, the second the first pitch is thrown with him in the lineup, or the second the game is over (and the statistics are 'official')?

Posted
Yeah, we probably don't need to bother with waivers after the draft. There won't be much to claim, and it would probably only benefit teams with late waiver spots anyway, since teams with higher waiver priority aren't going to use it for what's available.
Community Moderator
Posted
Okay, that makes sense.

 

One more question: What is the definition of "played" as it pertains to a prospect having played at AA or higher (and then becoming eligible for MLB rosters)?

 

Does it apply the second a prospect steps onto a AA or higher field, the second the first pitch is thrown with him in the lineup, or the second the game is over (and the statistics are 'official')?

 

I actually meant to address this at some point, so thanks for bringing it up. I guess we need an arbitrary rule.

 

Definition of played = he does enough to register 1 in the 'G' column on baseball reference. So getting in as a pinch runner or defensive sub would suffice.

 

If a player gets promoted to AA and does enough to register a game played ('G' on BR), then they can be added as soon as 3 AM on the next calendar day PST. So 6 AM EST on the next calendar day after the day the AA game in which the player played began. These times were picked so that all games would probably be over.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Okay, that makes sense.

 

One more question: What is the definition of "played" as it pertains to a prospect having played at AA or higher (and then becoming eligible for MLB rosters)?

 

Does it apply the second a prospect steps onto a AA or higher field, the second the first pitch is thrown with him in the lineup, or the second the game is over (and the statistics are 'official')?

 

What very specific prospect could you possibly be talking about. I just can't C Just who you could be talking about.

Posted
What very specific prospect could you possibly be talking about. I just can't C Just who you could be talking about.

lol. There's actually a whole whack of guys. The first days of the MiLB season will be a frenzy.

 

I actually meant to address this at some point, so thanks for bringing it up. I guess we need an arbitrary rule.

 

Definition of played = he does enough to register 1 in the 'G' column on baseball reference. So getting in as a pinch runner or defensive sub would suffice.

 

If a player gets promoted to AA and does enough to register a game played ('G' on BR), then they can be added as soon as 3 AM on the next calendar day PST. So 6 AM EST on the next calendar day after the day the AA game in which the player played began. These times were picked so that all games would probably be over.

Okay. That's a good way to do it. I'm going to have to sync all my clocks to Yahoo time :P

Posted
I actually meant to address this at some point, so thanks for bringing it up. I guess we need an arbitrary rule.

 

Definition of played = he does enough to register 1 in the 'G' column on baseball reference. So getting in as a pinch runner or defensive sub would suffice.

 

If a player gets promoted to AA and does enough to register a game played ('G' on BR), then they can be added as soon as 3 AM on the next calendar day PST. So 6 AM EST on the next calendar day after the day the AA game in which the player played began. These times were picked so that all games would probably be over.

 

JFaS, we should add the same to BBDL rules.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
lol. There's actually a whole whack of guys. The first days of the MiLB season will be a frenzy.

 

I'll be interesting to see how eager people will be to use roster spots on fresh AA guys when they aren't slam dunk top 100 prospect types.

Community Moderator
Posted
I'll be interesting to see how eager people will be to use roster spots on fresh AA guys when they aren't slam dunk top 100 prospect types.

 

There aren't many talents that I'd waste a spot on. I'd take a guy like CJ.E, sure, but I'd value an SP7 over most else.

 

But, my NA slot will also likely be filled with Bauer or Bradley Jr., so that factors into it.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Does anyone have an NA spot they expect to be vacant heading into the season? I'm honestly interested.
Posted
Does anyone have an NA spot they expect to be vacant heading into the season? I'm honestly interested.

 

Mine will be occupied by future batting champ Tommy "The Star" La Stella until Dan Ugly loses his job.

Posted
Does anyone have an NA spot they expect to be vacant heading into the season? I'm honestly interested.

I'll pick up an NA guy once the waiver draft ends, but will probably drop him once a better prospect becomes eligible.

Posted
Jaysblue picked David Hernandez.

 

Good pick since,

 

2/10/2014: Hernandez may be a candidate for the closer's role, MLB.com reports.

 

Stupid Arizona, man I hate them!

 

Don't they have Reed lol?

Posted
Would you trade Wily Peralta for Lorenzo Cain in a salary dynasty league?

 

No. Peralta has more upside. Cain is pretty irrelevant for fantasy.

Posted
Reed, Putz, Zeigler. I don't understand why they would go with anyone other than Reed though. Makes no sense.

 

Nothing makes sense in Arizona.

Posted
There aren't many talents that I'd waste a spot on. I'd take a guy like CJ.E, sure, but I'd value an SP7 over most else.

 

But, my NA slot will also likely be filled with Bauer or Bradley Jr., so that factors into it.

 

He's ineligible to be taken anyway.

Community Moderator
Posted
He's ineligible to be taken anyway.

 

We were talking about popping prospects during the season as soon as they hit AA

Community Moderator
Posted
Would you trade Wily Peralta for Lorenzo Cain in a salary dynasty league?

 

I think they both suck, so I would just take whoever fills the bigger hole on your team.

 

With Peralta, I think you get a 4.xx FIP pitcher that, if you're lucky, Lucroy frames into a 4.00 ERA guy with a middling amount of K's, and below average (for fantasy) OBPA and K/BB.

You can get similar pitchers on the waiver wire throughout any given season.

 

Lorenzo Cain could go 10/20 with a 100 wRC+ (think .260/.320/.400), but those are mediocre numbers and CF is not thin in fantasy baseball right now.

 

Honestly, I think you can get more for Peralta than Cain, based on the fact that Peralta is young, seems promising, and SP can get pretty thin in deep leagues. I would continue to shop Peralta but look for something a bit better.

Community Moderator
Posted
Oh my bad. I should read the whole page before replying.

 

Reason #12 why you'll never be a Darrell...

Verified Member
Posted
Reason #12 why you'll never be a Darrell...

 

Interested if you manage to list reasons 1 through 11.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Blue Jays community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...