Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

Terminator

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    22,061
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    113

 Content Type 

Profiles

Toronto Blue Jays Videos

2026 Toronto Blue Jays Top Prospects Ranking

Toronto Blue Jays Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Toronto Blue Jays Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Toronto Blue Jays Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Terminator

  1. It's similar to the Benitendi trade in that it doesn't really raise the bar all that much over what they already had. Montas the new #3 come playoff time and the #4 is between Montgomery or Taillon.
  2. The A's are like that guy in your fantasy league who makes terrible trades all the time. I'd like to launch a veto campaign against their latest trade but we've gone to the well too many times to be that upset about it.
  3. How do you not get one of the Yankee SS prospects if you're the A's lol Yankees still have plenty of bullets left
  4. Yankees assembling one of the greatest roster of all time. Meanwhile, we've got Ross "Sitting on his" ASS-kins. DO SOMETHING
  5. I don't think we really have a comparable return but yeah Castillo would be the closest thing.
  6. It wouldn't really bother me that much if the Yankees did get him. It'd almost be like the Benitendi trade (decent trade but just marginal improvement) but on a bigger scale meaning they'd have to give up more prospect capital. They've already got a pretty good 4-man playoff rotation. Montas would be making a few starts instead of either Montgomery, Taillon or German depending on what they would decide to do.
  7. This is an interesting trade. -Brewers get a Hader replacement in Rogers before he hits FA at the end of the year. Then they get two prospects and a wild card reliever on top of it. -Padres get a year and a half of Hader. Weird to see two contenders make a trade like this but given the strengths of each team I think it makes a lot of sense for both sides.
  8. Trading Cimber makes zero sense lol. We need to acquire more good relievers in addition to the ones we already have.
  9. Although Baez almost made me crap my pants there lol
  10. He looks relatively fine to me
  11. Happ would be a pretty sweet addition. We need arms though and we also need Castillo. He's our #6 SP right now.
  12. Anytime you get the chance to lock up an oft-injured 37 year old reliever with a career 4.00 ERA you gotta do it.
  13. Kikuchi is fixed. Sole focus should be on acquiring relievers. This will be easy.
  14. Kikuchi is fixed. Start looking at relievers no starters are needed.
  15. Kikuchi dominated. Cancel all trade talks for a SP. Relievers only now.
  16. If Jays are in the hunt for rentals Rodon would be a very good addition.
  17. Looks like the walls are higher too. But then dead center has short walls. So hitting one out at dead center might be a little easier then if you are right or left of dead center a little bit. Either way, I like small quirks like this instead of the cookie cutter dimensions we had before.
  18. These are just the "outfield" upgrades. They are saying that "infield" upgrades are coming soon.
  19. Ok so they are: 1. adding more bar and patio areas, and 2. eliminating that awkward gap between the OF fence and the OF seats. In some cases this is done by bringing the seats to the wall, in other instances this is done by raising the bullpen area to meet the seats. I think these are going to be great changes. The Rockies added a bunch of bar/patio areas and it was very popular. It's a place for casual fans (aka girls and the guys who follow them) to go and drink in the summertime. It also improves the aesthetics of the stadium. At times, the stadium always kind of looked similar to Oakland Coliseum with that stupid gap. Third, it brings the OF seats closer to the action.
  20. I think Gausman should have at least been HM on that list. He's expensive but so is Mookie Betts who is signed for far longer and is ranked in the 20s.
  21. Riccardi was okay but his drafting and development stunk. He put a heavy focus on college players which lead to a ton of low ceiling prospects. He was the beneficiary of a payroll spike and he actually managed that pretty well in signing Burnett (highly controversial at the time) and trading for Glaus and Overbay, etc. But because of the lack of player development, the teams were always paper thin. In this division, we need someone better than him.
×
×
  • Create New...