Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

saskjayfan

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    10,349
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Toronto Blue Jays Videos

2025 Toronto Blue Jays Top Prospects Ranking

Toronto Blue Jays Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Toronto Blue Jays Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by saskjayfan

  1. bringing in loup would have meant Young batting though
  2. no problem for the hawk.....what you guys worrying about?
  3. bats doesn't like when donaldson gets too far ahead of him in the HR race..lol
  4. Did you really need to say xFIP/FIP/SIERRA are objective measure of performance after I said you believe they are infallible. Firstly, they all differ so which one is the most objective..lol. You keep putting words in my mouth. Where did I make a snap judgement and point to ERA? I said FIP doesn't distinguish between the type of contact and xfip doesn't take into account the number of line drives a pitcher gives up. I then went through the macro statistics outlining how much more damaging line drive hits are relative to ground balls and flyballs. I then compared Hutch and Sanchez to show that Hutch had given up far more line drives and far more hard hit balls than Sanchez. I indicated you believe this to be random bad luck. I disagree with that supposition. I believe that when hutch and Sanchez both throw a pitch that lands in the heart of the plate that Sanchez' is harder to hit. He throws harder, and his ball movement takes the ball off the barrel of the bat. I've heard the mlb experts who were former pitchers talk about Sanchez and articulate this point. I witnessed Martin call 40 straight fastballs, because Sanchez on the night had great movement and was keeping the ball in the zone. Even with players knowing what was coming they weren't hitting it. Why would Martin call the game this way if Sanchez was simply getting "LUCKY" as you like to point out. Sanchez has only struck out 5.9 batter per 9 yet even with that low strike out rate has only given up 7.4 hits per 9. Hutch has given up 10.8 hits per 9 despite the fact that he has struck out 7.9 batters per 9. You're saying fip is objective and infallible. Hutch is the most unlucky man alive. You think Sanchez is the luckiest man alive and should just quit baseball and start buying lottery tickets because he'd win for sure. I dispute this. I don't think Hutch has been better than Sanchez because his FIP is lower. I am not suggesting he is better because his ERA is lower. So quit spouting off that I'm using ERA to judge the two for fawk sakes..lol
  5. martin....super speed for a catcher
  6. 5 to 0 take EE out of this game already
  7. yeah...but is the ump spitting on the ball for just the yanks..lol
  8. between the second and third strike to donaldson the ump clearly spit on a baseball....why would he do that? Anyone?
  9. why is the ump spitting on the ball?
  10. so you ditched your sponge bob undies a couple years ago and now you're ready to take on the world! In 10 years from now when you get married you're going to go from being right 100 percent of the time to almost zero.lol
  11. A bunch of 16 year olds telling a 50 year old the way it is. Old people don't know anything!
  12. hitting it hard all night at guys...fawk
  13. come on...let's get on base...a walk will do
×
×
  • Create New...