Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

John_Havok

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    21,482
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    29

 Content Type 

Profiles

Toronto Blue Jays Videos

2026 Toronto Blue Jays Top Prospect Rankings

Toronto Blue Jays Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Toronto Blue Jays Fan Guides & Resources

2025 Toronto Blue Jays Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Toronto Blue Jays News, Rumors & Analysis

2026 Toronto Blue Jays Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by John_Havok

  1. Well sure, hope for it, but when they fall short it really shouldn't be disappointing.
  2. Using the average needed win total of 83 for the 2nd WC spot, the jays would need to go 27 and 18 over their last 45 games. There's currently 7 teams above them, the 2 best of which would only need to win 24 and 25 games over their remaining schedules, not to mention the other 5 teams that would need between 25 and 27 wins as well. For the Jays to do what they need to do AND have 7 other teams not do what they need to do is virtually impossible, especially given the state of the roster
  3. It's called hyperbole. Just saying that overtaking 7 teams, even if the gap is only 3.5 games is a monumentally near impossible task
  4. Apparantly an ankle injury based on the comments to that tweet
  5. Just need Bogaerts not to be a complete pylon and I should remain top 2
  6. No doubt. Mathematically possible but very improbable. They could go on a 20 game winning streak starting today and still probably not have a wildcard spot.
  7. Starting to look like I should have doubled down, though spats could overtake pretty easily
  8. We had one at DH, then he got hurt
  9. That will teach him to run out a grounder..... God f***ing dammit. I thought I might be able to sneak back up into 6th in the FC but if he's out for a while I'm pretty much f***ed.
  10. Look up. I added the video
  11. Speaking on behalf of all Harper fantasy owners.... FFFFFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCCCCCCCCCKKKKKKKKKK!
  12. Well that's kinda what I'm getting at. Dude was hitting those things 400+ feet regularly so take off the 10% increase and he's still hitting a huge amount of dingers pretty much anywhere
  13. I wonder then (assuming the 10% is accurate), how much of an improvement someone's numbers wouod get over the course of a season? Obviously he wouldn't get the 10% distance boost on every batted ball contact, only the contacts that would qualify as hard contact a a certain range of launch angles. Like, did Bonds go from 30 to 73 HR because of steroids? That doesn't seem logical. 60 to 73? Maybe closer to the truth.
  14. Pitch velocity doesn't matter tha much, but lunch angle and the air resistance would be needed for sure.
  15. Omar, I just tried googling this and failed, but can you find anything that show's how much batted ball distance goes up with say a 2% increase in bat speed, assuming other factors remain constant?
  16. Yeah Biagini would probably be the better choice as a 5, but I think there's a pretty strong possibility they'll both be in the rotation next year behind Stro, Happ and Sanchez - assuming his delicate lady fingers can figure out how not to blister
  17. Not eyesight... hand eye coordination...speed of decision making... etc.
  18. They touched on it in some of his links. Pretty much everyone on steroids said they felt invincible while using. It's also proven to help muscle recovery.
  19. If you find the article and show me they tested actual players batspeed per and post steroid, I'll concede defeat. As I said from the get go, I agree with premise that more muscle mass should equal more bat speed. My only point of contention is the 5% you posted, and the article you posted for support itself initially said 5%, but was then revised and only came up with 3.8%, and that final number came down to multiple assumptions, including estimates on how much kinetic energy was tranferred and how much presteroid weight is muscle mass. Those assumptions would have to be 100% accurate for 3.8% to be factually correct. That's my point. It's a guess. Educated... but still a guess.
  20. Yeah, likely some teams have called to test the waters so in order to even go beyond preliminary lip service, they gotta try and get him through waivers.
  21. Having a rough night Spanks? My post had nothing to do with comparing Redmond to Rowley, it was just stating Redmond isn't playing anymore.
×
×
  • Create New...