So he was slumping hard during summer camp and that carried over to the start of season but it must’ve been the injury? As was discussed before, you can make whatever narrative you want based on data. If he had a really bad last two weeks you could just say he was really dinged up through the year and it caught up to him at the end
The week he missed was the second part of the season when he was doing good (started to hit). It’s just a dumb way to spin the narrative.
Not saying I dislike him or the signing...but it should be noted the “average production level” he finished at was his 90+ bat... so there’s really no glory in that. Not sure why that was added to the article like it was a win