I didn't not say that exactly. I am just saying what her lawyers will probably say.
But whether she had a skull fracture is very relevant because that is the untruth. The lie. The misrepresentation.
The important questions are things like:
- what exactly did the evidence say and how was it displayed
If page 1 of the dossier is a CT scan that says in bold "no evidence of any skull fractures" then Molly Knight might be in trouble.
If page 169 of the dossier has a very tiny print, bad scan, of a handwritten interpretation of a CT scan that says "some evidence of possible basal skull fr. but further examination leads me to not diagnose same" then maybe she is fine.