It's an interesting thought problem.
It shows how easy it is for people to get fooled by numbers. Most people aren't great at thinking about things in, like, an economically and statistically wholesome way, with weight given to the constraints of the system (scarcity) and what the underlying statistical distribution might look like.
You just give people the absolute difference or absolute number, and for most people contextualizing it properly is difficult and they fall short.
You see similar problems in health media and public health discourse where the gen pop just struggles on the numbers. And/or the media knows they struggle on the numbers so they take advantage of that.