Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

Stangstag

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    28,537
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    25

 Content Type 

Profiles

Toronto Blue Jays Videos

2026 Toronto Blue Jays Top Prospects Ranking

Toronto Blue Jays Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Toronto Blue Jays Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Toronto Blue Jays Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Stangstag

  1. Yeah that number is fine. Hell we gave that to a 40 year old Kendrys Morales. If its more like 3/45 then it starts getting fuglier
  2. I could see them winning 85 games, but i could also see them winning 95. Same with the Jays really
  3. 2/25 for Soler? 3/30 maybe? I’d take that all day.
  4. Lol that was fun
  5. Good deal
  6. Lol yeah, I feel like he actually needs to experience this arb hearing. Maybe take him down a few pegs
  7. Idk why you would assume that every player on the team plays at exactly the same level. Also you’re missing other moves like - Belt, - Hicks, + Green Just a stupid comment overall
  8. The way I see it, is some guys get hit by pitches in the same spot and they’re fine. Seems like every time Jansen gets hit in the hand its a broken bone. Some guys have weaker bones, some guys have weaker muscles and are more prone to strains. Genetics. I’d say Jansen falls into both camps. So yes, he firmly gets the injury-prone label and i’d be comfortable making a bet he doesn’t play 100 games next year.
  9. He’s a 2 WAR catcher even with the injuries. If he stays healthy he’s easily a 3+ WAR guy but that’s a huge IF. At this point he gets the glass/injury prone label. Something between 4/40 and 4/50 would still be fair IMO.
  10. Pretty sure they could package him in a trade rather than non-tender. He has some value
  11. Free speech doesn’t mean you’re free to slander whoever you want without consequence
  12. Lol if true
  13. "WAR is flawed, how can a guy hitting .220 be rated as a good player, blah blah blah"
  14. Im not disagreeing that Teoscar sucked last year and that KK was clearly better. Im just saying I highly doubt that will be the case for 2024. The Dodgers clearly think Teo will rebound, and so do I.
  15. Yeah I knew you would say that… idk seems like the projections tend to see defense as more repeatable than offense with him. His offensive projections have been consistently wrong every year, except last year which was a career-worst. We’ll see if 2023 was the outlier or if he has another 130 wRC+ season. I tend to feel he’s closer to that 130 number than the 110 projected
  16. He easily has 4+ WAR upside (he's already proven it in the past), and that's exactly why he was such a frustrating player last year. Really hope he turns it around next season.
  17. Teoscar has the potential upside of producing a 3-4 WAR season while KK does not. Risk/reward. You're cherry-picking by only using last year's numbers.
  18. Right so now Daulton Varsho will be starting in LF 100 times and in CF the other 60 times... which is worse
  19. Have you read some of the s*** around here? Numerous posters that would gladly DFA Varsho if they were in charge, or relegate him to a bench role.
  20. Thanks. Yeah the full-page popup ada have been annoying AF. And the site has been intermittently on and off all day, was out for a couple hours at one point.
  21. Seems like they really soured on Teo, for whatever reason. Because he would fit nicely here on a 1 year deal. 20 million is a bit much though IMO.
  22. I could definitely see Chapman to the Yanks. And it would suck.
  23. 4/80 for Chapman is palatable. I think his contract will be close to Springer’s though. 150 for Bellinger is still risky but I’d probably do it considering the team’s current/future outlook.
×
×
  • Create New...