Believe it or not, I don't think Schilling's opinions, regardless of what I or anyone else think of them, should have any influence on a HOF vote. To consider his opinions when filling out a HOF vote will have the effect of silencing any other MLB'er with HOF aspirations. That is not right.
If Schilling is charged and convicted, that is a different matter. Until then, his free speech rights should not be infringed directly or indirectly (by HOF voter moral judgements).
As for Rose, he broke the rules, too bad. But this doesn't mean the HOF can't put up some information on him, just not as a HOF'er. Compromise.