This team currently ranks 19th in MLB with a .315 OBP. We also rank 2nd in HR's with 98, yet we sit 10th in total runs (although we have been climbing the ranks for sometime now).
My question is if this lineup is built around game changing power, wouldn't it be simple logic to have a high OBP guy over a speedster who can't get on base? The runs created by SB, surely don't outweigh the runs created by being on base more often by a significant margin.
If this team is looking to win now, then why are we not going with the better win now options? As minor as some moves may be, everything adds up in the end.
Adding Reyes to the lineup provides a significant OBP jump for this team, and bumping one of our better OBP guys to the bench in favor of a guy who can't get on base at even league average would make sense wouldn't it?
This has nothing to do with sentiments over Kawasaki, because honestly, I couldn't give a s***, I care more about the quality of our team on the field.
I just wonder if one of AA's biggest deficiencies as a GM is that he is a player hoarder and lets this get in the way of what is really best for this team? When were demoting guys who are well above the teams OBP for guys who are well below MLB average, questions need to be raised. Especially when you consider Kawasaki is a better defender at SS than the other three options (Derosa, Boni, Izturis).
Wouldn't DFA Boni, having Izturis/Derosa as our b2B options, Reyes/Kawasaki/Izturis as our SS options and Derosa/Izturis as our 3B options until Lawrie returns be sufficient? We already have Davis as a 4th OF, why do we need 5 when we have other guys who could step into LF on an emergency basis as well? Plus we have Gose and Sierra in AAA who could step in ASAP if an injury hit.