Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

G-Snarls

Community Moderator
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    40,694

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    12

 Content Type 

Profiles

Toronto Blue Jays Videos

2025 Toronto Blue Jays Top Prospects Ranking

Toronto Blue Jays Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Toronto Blue Jays Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by G-Snarls

  1. G-Snarls
    Yeah you can't stop now Alpha Dog Atkins on the hunt
  2. G-Snarls
    I'd bet a large Tim's that Gurriel would play better at 3B than Vlad in 2021 (not that I think it's necessarily the best solution but yeah...)
  3. G-Snarls
    So yeah now it's a situation LOL
  4. G-Snarls
    MLB Network peeps think Brantley will mostly DH
  5. G-Snarls
    Yeah I think more likely a trade but...
  6. G-Snarls
    Unlike last tiime we went hard we haven't lost ANY of the great farm system
  7. G-Snarls
    Is there any chance they're actually thinking of moving Gurriel back to the infield??
  8. G-Snarls
    I'm thinking at least two more And pull off one trade
  9. G-Snarls
    FWIW a handful of recent successful closers and number of seasons with 70+ appearances Chapman 0 Jansen 1 Hader 0 Osuna 1 (yeah Gibby!) Hand 2 Kimbrel 0 Diaz 1 Hendriks 2 Even Mariano Rivera only did it 3 times
  10. G-Snarls
    Please Charlie only use him 70 times if he's really really good Thank you, Ross ALPHA MF Atkins
  11. G-Snarls
    TSN covers baseball?? I thought they only covered hockey and the Raptors
  12. G-Snarls
    It doesn't matter how the WAR is accumulated I suppose But projecting over the next 6 years... I prefer a contact hitter with on base skills plus power who is a good overall player rather than a guy who derives most of his value with either just speed or just power. Springer is very well rounded.
  13. G-Snarls
    That'd be great actually
  14. G-Snarls
    Except Josh Hamilton was a one dimensional player (power with high strikeouts and bad defense) and an addict, going to Los Angeles with 125 million dollars to spend on bad habits There was always a massive risk involved there
  15. G-Snarls
    Keeping someone capable of playing passable CF (Ie Grichuk) isn't a bad thing anyway in case of injury to early 30s Springer or so he can have an occasional day off
  16. G-Snarls
    I am hoping that it's at least a bit front loaded so we can more easily afoord the young guys as they get raises I know that doesn't help with the luxury tax but no way the Jays ever go that high anyway
  17. G-Snarls
    He was the player who would sign that could improve the team the most
  18. G-Snarls
    That lineup is sick and the rotation perfectly adequate
  19. G-Snarls
    LOL. Silly me
  20. G-Snarls
    Right It just pushes Fisher, Davis and Alford further down the depth chart
  21. G-Snarls
    That lineup is just.... Dayum
  22. G-Snarls
    If they get Brantley they clearly have a trade in the works involving at least one of our current outfielders
  23. G-Snarls
    OK So Mets were willing to do 6 years too But we outbid in $$
  24. G-Snarls
    Like wirth Ryu, Jays had to go one extra year So be it So happy right now
  25. G-Snarls
    Bigger and bigger names adding credibility
×
×
  • Create New...