Abomination

Let's not. There's way too many idiots running around doing stuff like that. Be better. Stick to facts. I mean, it's not hard to back up the argument as it stands.

I think the main concern people will have is what happens if the company goes under? Not owning physical copies also allows copies to go poof very easily. Several companies that deal in ultraviolet and other digital copies of movies have disappeared, so it does happen. If the NFT exchange for the cards is proprietary, it's very much at risk.

It'll be more hilarious when someone from the division wins the title this year.

I'd settle for a walk-off WP.

They're going to have to if this goes much longer. Snead has to be next up, doesn't he?

The era of people having to act like stuffy robots to be considered professional is over. Society evolved. Sports evolved. You haven't.

Hand is a human rain delay out there.

Please don't do that again Vladdy!

Lol. It could hit him in the ... yeah, we all saw where it was headed. That reaction was pure self-preservation.

I had to step away for a sec and missed Miggy's home run As a Blue Jays fan, that sucks. Boy did my LOD team need it though!

It would be epic if Bo took a fly swatter out there with him next inning

You'll have to figure out how, because Hutch will probably find a way to no hit us.

It's the dog days of August, and Reese's boys are doing some barking.

This might be my favourite video of the year

It was time for me to stop being stubborn and address my pitching. I think I now have a legitimate starting staff.

Heh. I had an eBay sale hit the same instant you accepted. I saw the popup for the trade combined with the sale sound and wondered what the hell was going on

Lowry's big day might save my entry.

I don't care if it's the corpse of Russ Adams that wins the game for us, as long as SOMEBODY walks it off.

Looks like Berger saved his skin at the last possible moment. Schwartzel was in position to make the cut, then decided to bogey the final two holes

It wasn't important so I didn't want to create walls of text, but fine. The very headline starts by saying that Bauer won the hearing but lost anyway. How exactly? Apparently because the information in the hearing, which he had already freely made public before, was made public again . It then talks extensively about the Dodgers and how they can terminate his contract. This is an article about a legal proceeding for a restraining order. The rest is designed to focus the reader on his guilt by assuming it before any future proceedings addressing that even occur. For the few parts that were actually on topic, the criticism of the petitioner seems mostly fair. The criticism of the judge does not. While I'm not an attorney, the matter of what the limits were and what can and can't be consented to seems like it should be fundamentally different when it comes to considering a restraining order vs a civil or criminal suit. The entire argument made in the article seems targeted to the latter rather than the former. It's basically interspersing two different things in the same article, hoping that no one notices imo. Back to the point, the restraining order, I believe, is primarily considering what physical or perhaps emotional risk Bauer poses in the immediate future to the petitioner. It seems like he made it pretty clear in communications that he never wanted to see or speak to her again, and that was before any talk of legal proceedings. Someone may wish to correct me, but I suspect the main effect it would have would be to allow the petitioner's side to say whatever the hell they wanted on social media without fear of Bauer's side posting contradictory texts or otherwise being able to directly defend themselves. I may be wrong about that. The criticism of Bauer's side doesn't really make sense. It's mostly centered on already established facts being stated again and complaining that Bauer's attorney attacked the credibility of the petitioner...

It really depends. All the different groups have vastly varying rules. Some can only have a car if it's black. Some can have the internet or a phone at their main church or whatever, but only use it for doing business. Some seem to feel they're playing dangerously if their horse drawn cart has a roof. The ones around here are pretty strict. It is rather funny though that when I used to see them at auctions, they would buy up all the electrical testing equipment. I never did figure out why. They sure as hell didn't have electricity.

Are you kidding?

And the most important thing: a manager. It may be debatable how many wins a manager can gain you, but Charlie is dead set on demonstrating how many one can cost you.

How is that a theory? If anything, that would mean he'd be even better off taking multi-year deals because it would increase the likelihood he could get some sort of settlement if the team tried to terminate his contract (rather than just letting it run out).

Pretty sure the precedent is basically fictional.