TheHurl

We'll have to get our bi-annual (is that every six months or every two years, I never know that one...I mean every two years in this case) hottest girls of the Olympics poll going.

now you sound like my female friends...or my lawyer

This scenario seems so much lessened when you have sandwich meat in the fridge. It's not steak, it's not not even frozen pasta but you aren't going to starve. Just give Stroman the job.

I looked it up as I was thinking I'd book his bets for him (I didn't like several of his wagers) and that 10k pesos would be small but it's actually $254 CDN. As for the wager itself, they are fun to play but considering they pay out under even money and the wager won't be paid out for 8 months they really aren't worth it unless you are betting bigger than I'm willing to put down. That's why I loved it when SI used to let me parlay them.

Nope just goes back to who I started with. SI is a pain in the ass for withdrawal's but I went through the process to get my account verified (and now withdrawals are instantaneous) so I stick with them.

SI will be up in March. They no longer allow parlays on futures though, used to be their biggest appeal to me.

Here is the full lines. Ones that stand out for me are Washington (under), Houston (over), Baltimore (under), Dodgers (under), Cubs (over), Cleveland (over). Here’s the full list of 2014 MLB season win totals from the Atlantis Resort Spa Sportsbook in Reno, Nevada: Arizona Diamondbacks - 81 (over -110/under -110) Atlanta Braves - 86.5 (over -110/under -110) Baltimore Orioles - 80.5 (over -110/under -110) Boston Red Sox - 87.5 (over -110/under -110) Chicago Cubs - 65.5 (over -110/under -110) Chicago White Sox - 76.5 (over -105/under -115) Cincinnati Reds - 87.5 (over -105/under -115) Cleveland Indians - 82.5 (over -105/under -115) Colorado Rockies - 76.5 (over -110/under -110) Detroit Tigers - 91.5 (over -110/under -110) Houston Astros - 57.5 (over -115/under -105) Kansas City Royals - 85.5 (over -110/under -110) Los Angeles Angels - 84.5 (over -110/under -110) Los Angeles Dodgers - 92.5 (over -110/under -110) Miami Marlins - 66.5 (over -110/under -110) Milwaukee Brewers - 78.5 (over -105/under -115) Minnesota Twins - 65.5 (over -105/under -115) New York Mets - 71.5 (over -110/under -120) New York Yankees - 83.5 (over -110/under -110) Oakland Athletics - 86.5 (over -115/under -105) Philadelphia Phillies - 78 (over -110/under -110) Pittsburgh Pirates - 86.5 (over -105/under -110) San Diego Padres - 76.5 (over -110/under -110) San Francisco Giants - 86.5 (over -110/under -110) Seattle Mariners - 80 (over -110/under -110) St. Louis Cardinals - 90.5 (over -110/under -110) Tampa Bay Rays - 88.5 (over -110/under -110) Texas Rangers - 86.5 (over -110/under -110) Toronto Blue Jays - 77.5 (over -115/under -105) Washington Nationals - 90.5 (over -110/under -110)

I love over under bets and have had a lot of success with them over the years (including getting the Jays correct the last three years). Zero chance I'd be touching the Jays here

who's scouting? I don't see Rosario in that pic

Ang took it out on the poor Burro!

sorry to all that I have deals on the go with. I'm off next week and will be confirming everything.

much more than what he was getting from me...not to mention I've been responding about 5 days after our counteroffers so I'm sure it was frustrating for him. I think we were at Springer, Wood and the #5 waiver for Upton but I wanted a good waiver spot back.

Ang is in the Jays FO now? f***...I stole Spanky's joke. I'm going on a drinking spree now.

Like we are naming you a captain. Admin won't even allow you to play as he can't afford that much of a post drop for 3 hours.

13 is actually one of the all time best draft spots for production (ManRam, Tanana, Templeton, Konerko, Nolan, A. Hill, Sale) but you also have: Grant Green, Beau Mills, Ty Colvin, Brandon Snyder, Shawn Boyd, Mike Paradis, J.M. Gold, Kyle Peterson, Rob Stratton, Matt Drews and Chad McConnell.

That's not true at all. Rick Bosetti was s***...Carter was hugely over-rated and the Jays extended him long past his ability to produce just because of the championship seasons. He was a 9 win player in his first 3 years with the Jays and we won 2 championships. There are a lot of players in history that are better known and did a lot less.

I really liked the swing too. At least I was right in hating Gose. I'm batting .500 on that trade.

My unofficial drop list (still tentative) Josh Collmenter Seth Maness Junior Lake Kevin Youkalis Jake McGee Drew Storen LaTroy Hawkins Kills me to lose solid young pieces like Lake, McGee and Storen, but it's the nature of this beast.

JJ or are you calling No49 a Putz? Possibly a little from column A, a little from column B.

They got smart and have gone to a card system on the 20 pack (no tickets emailed to you, just loaded on to your card when you order them). I haven't even bought mine this year (and am not sure I will). Judging by the lack of calls I've got from the ticket agent, I'd say that sales are okay.

"You should see a doctor" that's NJH's pick up line.

who had the Malcolm Smith MVP ticket?

For the record as I will win a pool for $450 if Denver wins the game I have the following wagers on the game. Jan 25, 2014 1:16 AM Single Bet Seattle v Denver (Moneyline) Seattle +120Open 50.00 Possible Payout: 110.00 Jan 25, 2014 1:17 AM Single Bet Seattle v Denver (First Half Moneyline) Seattle +105Open 50.00 Possible Payout: 102.50 Jan 25, 2014 1:19 AM Single Bet Super Bowl XLVIII - Temperature - Snow during the game? (Specials) Yes (Snow) +600 Open 20.00 Possible Payout: 140 (not looking good) Jan 25, 2014 1:24 AM Single Bet Touchdown Scorers - Seattle (First Touchdown Scorer) Doug Baldwin +900 Open 5.00 Possible Payout: 50 Jan 25, 2014 1:24 AM Single Bet Touchdown Scorers - (First Touchdown Scorer) Doug Baldwin +2500 Open 5.00 Possible Payout: 130

First time I can remember watching the superbowl at home. Have 3 tests this week. no clue if he's lying or not Edit: he threw in a "Psych" tweet 10 minutes later.

I'm just re-drafting my drops. My junk is better than you junk