Deadpool Old-Timey Member Posted April 6, 2019 Posted April 6, 2019 I was informed today on the board that it is 2019 not 2005 and we can’t use certain words. I think you meant to say mentally challenged. "functionally retarded" isn't the same as "retarded". I will say "retarded" if I f***ing well want to, but I didn't in this case.
Deadpool Old-Timey Member Posted April 6, 2019 Posted April 6, 2019 Now ump is being a blind ****. Now? He's been f***ing terrible all game.
DigitalRock Old-Timey Member Posted April 6, 2019 Posted April 6, 2019 Now? He's been f***ing terrible all game. Yes he has meant to say again.
Abomination Old-Timey Member Posted April 6, 2019 Posted April 6, 2019 it’s unreal that they are actually paying people to watch replays and they fail that misreably at it. The people in the room are actual umpires (which is even worse). They rotate through there as part of the general umpire schedules.
Deadpool Old-Timey Member Posted April 6, 2019 Posted April 6, 2019 The people in the room are actual umpires (which is even worse). They rotate through there as part of the general umpire schedules. Well, since they clearly only hire the visually challenged to be actual umpires, it would make sense that the people in the replay room would be blind f***ing idiots too.
Deadpool Old-Timey Member Posted April 6, 2019 Posted April 6, 2019 The people in the room are actual umpires (which is even worse). They rotate through there as part of the general umpire schedules. Also, that's a real conflict of interest, 'cause they're going to want to protect their idiot associates.
Carlos Danger Old-Timey Member Posted April 6, 2019 Posted April 6, 2019 "functionally retarded" isn't the same as "retarded". I will say "retarded" if I f***ing well want to, but I didn't in this case. Hey, just trying to help, I am on your side. I got s*** today from Brownie for using an inappropriate word. I personally don’t give a f*** what words you use, was just trying to protect you from the more sensitive crowd
saskjayfan Old-Timey Member Posted April 6, 2019 Posted April 6, 2019 14 strikeouts We're 29% as a team for the year....yuck
DigitalRock Old-Timey Member Posted April 6, 2019 Posted April 6, 2019 We're 29% as a team for the year....yuck That's what you get with a team full of sub . 300 Obp free singers.
Carlos Danger Old-Timey Member Posted April 6, 2019 Posted April 6, 2019 Now ump is being a blind ****. I think you meant to say a visually challenged vagina.
Abomination Old-Timey Member Posted April 6, 2019 Posted April 6, 2019 We're 29% as a team for the year....yuck Coming into today we were 15th (in baseball, not the AL). Early season and cold weather will do that.
Carlos Danger Old-Timey Member Posted April 6, 2019 Posted April 6, 2019 I think the 2019 Biagini is a mirage and and as I type this they walk it off.. you still suck Biagini!
Abomination Old-Timey Member Posted April 6, 2019 Posted April 6, 2019 I was just starting to enjoy the early 2019 Biagini experience
Corporal Valdal Verified Member Posted April 6, 2019 Author Posted April 6, 2019 I know its a rebuild but what the f***? Seriously Astros at least went full retarded this is a other worldly
Carlos Danger Old-Timey Member Posted April 6, 2019 Posted April 6, 2019 Bunting was the right move. PH Hansen was not. Not executing fundamentals killed us.
saskjayfan Old-Timey Member Posted April 6, 2019 Posted April 6, 2019 I think the 2019 Biagini is a mirage and and as I type this they walk it off.. you still suck Biagini! 95 on the outside part of the plate. It was up a bit, but that's a nice piece of hitting. That wasn't a right down broadway gimmie by any stretch of the imagination.
DigitalRock Old-Timey Member Posted April 6, 2019 Posted April 6, 2019 95 on the outside part of the plate. It was up a bit, but that's a nice piece of hitting. That wasn't a right down broadway gimmie by any stretch of the imagination. Got to give credit to Santana there. Opposite field, deep part of the park.
havok24 Old-Timey Member Posted April 6, 2019 Posted April 6, 2019 Bunting was the right move. PH Hansen was not. Not executing fundamentals killed us. Bunting with a runner at 2B and no one out is just completely nonsensical.
Carlos Danger Old-Timey Member Posted April 6, 2019 Posted April 6, 2019 95 on the outside part of the plate. It was up a bit, but that's a nice piece of hitting. That wasn't a right down broadway gimmie by any stretch of the imagination. The batter before him took him to the deepest part of CF. Biagini gave up a s*** ton of HRs last year and regardless of the pitch location, he gave up another hard hit ball that this time went out. Results is all I care about, he didn't get results.. wasn’t on the D or umps.
Carlos Danger Old-Timey Member Posted April 6, 2019 Posted April 6, 2019 Bunting with a runner at 2B and no one out is just completely nonsensical. Wrong.
havok24 Old-Timey Member Posted April 6, 2019 Posted April 6, 2019 Wrong. Hey guys I think we found Don Wakamatsu's troll account.
Carlos Danger Old-Timey Member Posted April 6, 2019 Posted April 6, 2019 Bunting with a runner at 2B and no one out is just completely nonsensical. In addition John, your are making a generalization. It makes a huge difference if the scenario is 2nd inning or 8th, what the score is,if you have JD, JB, EE coming up cerca 2015 or the 2019 Blue Jays hitting a collective .190 and have been no hit for 25 plus innings and scored like 10 runs the whole year..
Jaysareus Verified Member Posted April 6, 2019 Posted April 6, 2019 Team can't hit and adding one player in Guerrero won't make a lot of difference
havok24 Old-Timey Member Posted April 6, 2019 Posted April 6, 2019 In addition John, your are making a generalization. It makes a huge difference if the scenario is 2nd inning or 8th, what the score is,if you have JD, JB, EE coming up cerca 2015 or the 2019 Blue Jays hitting a collective .190 and have been no hit for 25 plus innings and scored like 10 runs the whole year.. Reducing your run expectancy in an inning is never a good idea. I mean it's one thing to bunt with a runner at 1B and 0 outs, but to do it with a runner in scoring position is just illogical. Why does this need to be explained to you? Just let the dude swing the bat.
Carlos Danger Old-Timey Member Posted April 6, 2019 Posted April 6, 2019 Hey guys I think we found Don Wakamatsu's troll account. I am actually Donald Trump and you are Wrong. You are Fake baseball information!
Carlos Danger Old-Timey Member Posted April 6, 2019 Posted April 6, 2019 Reducing your run expectancy in an inning is never a good idea. I mean it's one thing to bunt with a runner at 1B and 0 outs, but to do it with a runner in scoring position is just illogical. Why does this need to be explained to you? Just let the dude swing the bat. And did we get run after he did swing the bat and the next batter swung the bat.. No we did not. The percentages of a pass ball, sac fly, a fielders choice is so much more then a hit that will score the runner from 2nd on the 2019 Blue Jays. This is not the 2015 Blue Jays where I might not be so inclined to bunt.
Arjun Nimmala Vancouver Canadians - A+ SS It's been slow going at the start of the season for Nimmala, but on Sunday, he was 3-for-5 with his 3rd home run and 3 RBI. Explore Arjun Nimmala News >
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now