Spanky__99 Old-Timey Member Posted January 9, 2016 Posted January 9, 2016 But for him to never even get mentioned in conversation is weird, getting the joey belle treatment it seems. "Next year I just add to my ballot. Does Manny get the bonds treatment or the Sosa/ palmeiro treatment" Wat?
Spanky__99 Old-Timey Member Posted January 9, 2016 Posted January 9, 2016 You assume incorrectly. Way more evidence of bonds and Clemens cheating than others, but you pretend not to see that . What evidence would lead you to believe that the "safe bet " in your words that Griffey used peds and for what years do you suspect? The entire era? You know everybody!!!
Spanky__99 Old-Timey Member Posted January 9, 2016 Posted January 9, 2016 Exactly, saying people who still use the term retards don't come off as intelligent is pretty high and mighty. That being said, if didn't go to college, you are a f***ing dipshit lol
wamco Verified Member Posted January 9, 2016 Posted January 9, 2016 If you are trying to say there should be a better start than saves and that a 3 run save ain't s*** because 95 percent or so of those could be converted by any relief pitcher, I would agree. There is certainly a difference in closing out the 8th for the most part, even though I'm a big believer in a closer by committee if you have the players to do it by However, in the case of Hoff vs wag 600 saves vs 400 is substantial in hof discussion and that was shown in the voting. Also true that in real life if williams and Reardon didn't choke, we wouldn't have those banners flying. What's your ballot? You against kicking puppies? We ain't that much different you and I badass bro
Jonn Old-Timey Member Posted January 9, 2016 Posted January 9, 2016 I was 4 and 5 years old. Of course, "glory years" bandwagoners like yourself love bringing up 92/93 whenever they can, even if it has no relevance (like right now.) lol
wamco Verified Member Posted January 9, 2016 Posted January 9, 2016 You're an idiot. Whomever sticks up for the BBWAA process, is borderline retarded, or old as f***. Oh yeah... Thank you for proving my point. Weren't you just suspended from an internet message board? As an adult? For arguing with fans of the same team you support ? Also, didn't you say you were unemployed and stayed up all night? And you use the term retarded? Shocking
wamco Verified Member Posted January 9, 2016 Posted January 9, 2016 You're an idiot. Whomever sticks up for the BBWAA process, is borderline retarded, or old as f***. Oh yeah... What parts of the process do you object to exactly?
wamco Verified Member Posted January 9, 2016 Posted January 9, 2016 Whoosh, straight over your head. There's an argument for Sheffield, but he's no Bonds, etc... What? I'm asking seriously, where is the support for sheff even though I don't support him. Why is his voting so different from Bags, and piazza
wamco Verified Member Posted January 9, 2016 Posted January 9, 2016 Wat? What part didn't you understand?
Spanky__99 Old-Timey Member Posted January 9, 2016 Posted January 9, 2016 Uhmm... you are mis-representing these folk and logic. Ugghhh...trolled, well played. I hope.
wamco Verified Member Posted January 9, 2016 Posted January 9, 2016 The entire era? You know everybody!!! What????
Spanky__99 Old-Timey Member Posted January 9, 2016 Posted January 9, 2016 What? I'm asking seriously, where is the support for sheff even though I don't support him. Why is his voting so different from Bags, and piazza Ask the BBWAA, that you're supporting dumnass!
wamco Verified Member Posted January 9, 2016 Posted January 9, 2016 And the public support? I don't see him on many ballots, did he make yours? What was yours?
Spanky__99 Old-Timey Member Posted January 9, 2016 Posted January 9, 2016 Thank you for proving my point. Weren't you just suspended from an internet message board? As an adult? For arguing with fans of the same team you support ? Also, didn't you say you were unemployed and stayed up all night? And you use the term retarded? Shocking See, your assumptions are vivid, and lie on zero fact. Ya invalid, if you completed college, I'm sure it was a community college, with little credibility. (See, I can do this too, dumn-dumn)
Spanky__99 Old-Timey Member Posted January 9, 2016 Posted January 9, 2016 What parts of the process do you object to exactly? Old School hardlines, meat.
wamco Verified Member Posted January 9, 2016 Posted January 9, 2016 How funny is it going to be when Edgar Martinez falls off the list and then David Ortiz (the guy who usually wins "the Edgar Martinez Award") gets in on his second try? Funny? Sad? Not funny at all? HOF voting just makes me sad more than anything. I wish it didn't have the power it does so we could all appreciate the greats without approval from a bunch of cynical, clueless old farts whom the game passed by decades ago. E: oh yeah, and Piazza was totally clean, right? Any justification to leave out Bonds. f***ing mouthbreathers. Would you object to Ortiz getting in? Why or why not ?
Spanky__99 Old-Timey Member Posted January 9, 2016 Posted January 9, 2016 What? I'm asking seriously, where is the support for sheff even though I don't support him. Why is his voting so different from Bags, and piazza I like Sheffield, he's a borderline HOF player, you don't seem to get it, do you? You point fingers, yet you haven't a f***ing clue who's used or not.
Boxcar Old-Timey Member Posted January 9, 2016 Posted January 9, 2016 Wow. Ya, Jeff Reardon and mitch Williams were very unimportant figures in the jays history. Or show the importance of closing out a game What about the duration of the 90 s makes you feel the safe bet was that Griff did ped. For the record I believe bagwell was on ped as well. U ? We've been over this three times. I think any player will cheat if given the chance. Did Bagwell? Maybe. I live in North America where people are generally presumed innocent until proven otherwise. I also said I don't care about who cheated; the steroid era was not the fault of the players. Most of them were using and I judge them comparatively. In an era where everyone cheated, Bonds, Clemens, Bagwell still rose above and dominated the sport. Your closer argument (if that's even enough to count as one) is so stupid that I'm going to go out of my way to tell you that I won't dignify it with a response.
Spanky__99 Old-Timey Member Posted January 9, 2016 Posted January 9, 2016 What part didn't you understand? Manny Ramirez is arguably one of the best RHB in MLB history?
wamco Verified Member Posted January 9, 2016 Posted January 9, 2016 See, your assumptions are vivid, and lie on zero fact. Ya invalid, if you completed college, I'm sure it was a community college, with little credibility. (See, I can do this too, dumn-dumn) What parts were untrue about you were untrue ?
Spanky__99 Old-Timey Member Posted January 9, 2016 Posted January 9, 2016 Would you object to Ortiz getting in? Why or why not ? As long as Edgar steps in first, sure.
Spanky__99 Old-Timey Member Posted January 9, 2016 Posted January 9, 2016 And the public support? I don't see him on many ballots, did he make yours? What was yours? I don't have a vote.
wamco Verified Member Posted January 9, 2016 Posted January 9, 2016 You mean regarding ped? So no issue with the 75 percent needed or 10 years on ballot or 10 player max or annual voting ?
Spanky__99 Old-Timey Member Posted January 9, 2016 Posted January 9, 2016 What???? The question is, who wasn't using, lol. Good Luck with that.
Boxcar Old-Timey Member Posted January 9, 2016 Posted January 9, 2016 Would you object to Ortiz getting in? Why or why not ? Not on his own merit necessarily. As of right now he wouldn't make my ten since the field is so stacked, but Edgar Martinez was: 1) a much better hitter 2) actually played third for a few years unlike completely position less Ortiz My issue would lie with the fact that the superior player who has the same biases (DHs shouldn't be in the hall) didn't get in while Ortiz did. I think anyone intelligent would have derived that from my post.
Spanky__99 Old-Timey Member Posted January 9, 2016 Posted January 9, 2016 What parts were untrue about you were untrue ? Plenty. Assumptions are fun, hey *******. PS. Your grammar is atrocious.
wamco Verified Member Posted January 9, 2016 Posted January 9, 2016 I like Sheffield, he's a borderline HOF player, you don't seem to get it, do you? You point fingers, yet you haven't a f***ing clue who's used or not. Wat ??? What makes him borderline and not a hall of fame in your mind? I acknowledge that there is a greater chance that some players used over others like when McGuire puts up an 800 slug pct for the 2nd half of his career. If you would rather assume there was the same probability that Ozzie Smith used ped than bonds, that is your call.
wamco Verified Member Posted January 9, 2016 Posted January 9, 2016 We've been over this three times. I think any player will cheat if given the chance. Did Bagwell? Maybe. I live in North America where people are generally presumed innocent until proven otherwise. I also said I don't care about who cheated; the steroid era was not the fault of the players. Most of them were using and I judge them comparatively. In an era where everyone cheated, Bonds, Clemens, Bagwell still rose above and dominated the sport. Your closer argument (if that's even enough to count as one) is so stupid that I'm going to go out of my way to tell you that I won't dignify it with a response. So nothing specific at all about griffey but you would wager your life that he was on ped. Nothing about his career number or body? Just that he played in that era. Bold.
Spanky__99 Old-Timey Member Posted January 9, 2016 Posted January 9, 2016 Wat ??? What makes him borderline and not a hall of fame in your mind? I acknowledge that there is a greater chance that some players used over others like when McGuire puts up an 800 slug pct for the 2nd half of his career. If you would rather assume there was the same probability that Ozzie Smith used ped than bonds, that is your call. Ozzie Smith, was a different era, plus he was a MIF, meat. Sheffield would be in(imo), loved the guy. To say others don't deserve it is absurd, don't you get it?
Boxcar Old-Timey Member Posted January 9, 2016 Posted January 9, 2016 What parts were untrue about you were untrue ? The f*** difference does it make, idiot? Why don't you stick to learning about baseball in this thread and stop worrying about who went to college and for how long. You have no clue about what Spank's life is like, what he does or what he's achieved and it has no relevance here. I see why you would go to it since you write like a 5 year old and are obviously insecure about your intellect but no one else here gives a s*** about your level of education because we can see that you're a retard from the things you're writing.
Johnny King Vancouver Canadians - A+ LHP He took the Loss, but the 19-year-old southpaw gave up one run on five hits and a walk in five innings on Wednesday night. Explore Johnny King News >
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now