Nexii Verified Member Posted August 20, 2014 Posted August 20, 2014 We all knew the Jays roster was slanted to offence, with pitching questionable. I was curious whether poor pitching teams can still win their division. The answer is that it's not that likely. Forgive the ugly formatting below, there isn't a good table function. 2014 Record ERA Rank WSN 71-53 3.06 1 MIL 71-55 3.57 8 LAD 71-56 3.36 3 STL 68-57 3.62 9 ATL 66-60 3.38 4 SFG 65-59 3.41 5 BAL 72-52 3.62 6 KCR 70-55 3.58 4 LAA 74-50 3.62 5 OAK 74-51 3.21 2 DET 67-56 3.97 10 SEA 68-57 2.94 1 TOR 64-62 4.17 11 2013 Record ERA Rank STL 97-65 3.42 5 ATL 96-66 3.18 1 LAD 92-70 3.25 2 PIT 94-68 3.26 3 BOS 97-65 3.79 6 OAK 96-66 3.56 2 DET 93-69 3.61 3 CLE 92-70 3.82 7 TBR 92-71 3.74 5 2012 Record ERA Rank WSH 98-64 3.33 1 CIN 97-55 3.34 2 SFG 94-68 3.68 5 ATL 94-68 3.42 4 NYY 95-67 3.84 5 DET 88-74 3.75 3 OAK 94-68 3.48 2 BAL 93-69 3.90 6 What we can see over the last three years is: - No AL team has won their division with an ERA over 3.84 (Jays at 4.17) - No team ranked below 6th in ERA has won their division (Jays at 11th) - MIL this year seems to be an outlier (8th and leading) - Even WC ranked teams are usually 6th or better in ERA, and rarely have below average pitching So the question is why is so much of the blame on our lineup? They've done pretty well I think when considering injuries. 2nd in AL OPS only to DET..
CHRIS Verified Member Posted August 20, 2014 Posted August 20, 2014 May the ERA police have mercy on your soul.
RealAccountant Old-Timey Member Posted August 20, 2014 Posted August 20, 2014 Baltimore is 20 games over .500 with the starters they have
dineke Old-Timey Member Posted August 20, 2014 Posted August 20, 2014 3 years is kinda a small sample size. But the answer is something something xFIP or something...
TheHurl Site Manager Posted August 20, 2014 Posted August 20, 2014 We all knew the Jays roster was slanted to offence, with pitching questionable. I think you answered your own question.
Nexii Verified Member Posted August 20, 2014 Author Posted August 20, 2014 No, my question was why the position players get blamed more than the pitching. It's the pitching that hasn't done well. You could do this for more seasons or xFIP, but I think it'd be similar. Not one of the 27 teams over the last 3 years did well with bad pitching (in the bottom third or so).
TheHurl Site Manager Posted August 20, 2014 Posted August 20, 2014 No, my question was why the position players get blamed more than the pitching. It's the pitching that hasn't done well. You could do this for more seasons or xFIP, but I think it'd be similar. Not one of the 27 teams over the last 3 years did well with bad pitching (in the bottom third or so). again it's probably to do with expectations...also because you are cherry picking teams. The Tigers are in 10th out of 15 teams and in a playoff spot this year. Milwaukee and St. Louis are 8th and 9th and in a playoff spot. The Indians won 91 games with a 3.82 ERA last year, and 4.02 and 3.90 ERA earned the Rangers and O's 93 wins each in 2012. Your whole post could have been summed up by saying "it'll be really tough to win games giving up more than 4 runs per game".
Dylan Old-Timey Member Posted August 20, 2014 Posted August 20, 2014 No, my question was why the position players get blamed more than the pitching. It's the pitching that hasn't done well. You could do this for more seasons or xFIP, but I think it'd be similar. Not one of the 27 teams over the last 3 years did well with bad pitching (in the bottom third or so). I've done nothing but bitch about our rotation/depth for years. I don't blame position players, unless they are named JP
Nexii Verified Member Posted August 20, 2014 Author Posted August 20, 2014 Cherrypicking? No team wants to just win a WC spot now. It's all about winning the division. DET'14 would not be in a playoff spot in previous years. There's a big difference between 3.82-4.02 ERA (somewhat below average) and 4.17 ERA (mediocre). TEX/BAL '12 were tied WC winners and had to do a one game playoff which is never preferable. Looking at MIL this year they are in a weak division and also exceeding their xW/L by 3 games. Maybe that was the Jays hope, that all 4 other teams would finish at or around .500? It's not so much about giving up more than 4 runs a game as requiring at least average pitching to get into the playoffs. You can't have below average pitching and expect to make the playoffs. I'd rank pitching generally as 1-5 = good, 6-10 average, 11-15 bad. How would the Jays look if they were even average (3.87 ERA) at pitching? 0.30 less ERA over a season is about 48.6 runs, or 5 wins. At the least they would still be in the running. Maybe even that wouldn't be enough, but it does go with generally having to have good pitching to make it. 1992 Jays had 3.91 ERA good for only 9th. Pythag was only 91-71, they actually got very lucky. (MIL '92 had xW/L of 96-66) 1993 Jays had 4.21 ERA good for 5th. Pythag again was only 91-71, but they were the strongest team in their division.
TheHurl Site Manager Posted August 20, 2014 Posted August 20, 2014 Cherrypicking? No team wants to just win a WC spot now. It's all about winning the division. DET'14 would not be in a playoff spot in previous years. There's a big difference between 3.82-4.02 ERA (somewhat below average) and 4.17 ERA (mediocre). TEX/BAL '12 were tied WC winners and had to do a one game playoff which is never preferable. Looking at MIL this year they are in a weak division and also exceeding their xW/L by 3 games. Maybe that was the Jays hope, that all 4 other teams would finish at or around .500? It's not so much about giving up more than 4 runs a game as requiring at least average pitching to get into the playoffs. You can't have below average pitching and expect to make the playoffs. I'd rank pitching generally as 1-5 = good, 6-10 average, 11-15 bad. How would the Jays look if they were even average (3.87 ERA) at pitching? 0.30 less ERA over a season is about 48.6 runs, or 5 wins. At the least they would still be in the running. Maybe even that wouldn't be enough, but it does go with generally having to have good pitching to make it. 1992 Jays had 3.91 ERA good for only 9th. Pythag was only 91-71, they actually got very lucky. (MIL '92 had xW/L of 96-66) 1993 Jays had 4.21 ERA good for 5th. Pythag again was only 91-71, but they were the strongest team in their division. We all know this, you're preaching to the guy that has called this no better than a .500 team all year even when they were 14 games over .500. I'm just saying that it's possible to make the playoffs with a higher ERA (not to mention the Jays fans would be ecstatic with a wildcard spot). Good pitching is much more difficult to acquire. The holes on offense were much easier to plug and improve the team. Moving forward the team might have opportunity to improve the staff internally (the optimal way) lets see how they handle that. But right now the pitching has been about what's expected of them, thus the reason they get a free pass (kind of)
CJ-Freeway Old-Timey Member Posted August 20, 2014 Posted August 20, 2014 I agree, our rotation is horrible and should take a big part of the blame for the team's woes.
Nexii Verified Member Posted August 20, 2014 Author Posted August 20, 2014 We all know this, you're preaching to the guy that has called this no better than a .500 team all year even when they were 14 games over .500. I'm just saying that it's possible to make the playoffs with a higher ERA (not to mention the Jays fans would be ecstatic with a wildcard spot). Good pitching is much more difficult to acquire. The holes on offense were much easier to plug and improve the team. Moving forward the team might have opportunity to improve the staff internally (the optimal way) lets see how they handle that. But right now the pitching has been about what's expected of them, thus the reason they get a free pass (kind of) Good points. I wonder where the Jays would be at if they'd spent all their money on pitching rather than offence. I suppose there was a chance their pitching could have been average or a bit above, but it didn't turn out that way.
Dick_Pole Old-Timey Member Posted August 20, 2014 Posted August 20, 2014 Rogers Centre Did the Jays play somewhere else in 2008? Blaming the Rogers Centre is such a cop out. Over the past 20 years this team has had a massive variance in run scored/given up season-to-season and go above and below averages for total runs scored for MLB all the time. I'm not an expert in park factors or where to find such reliable stats but Baseball Reference has the park factor wavering between 95 and 105 every year. And they are always lower in years that the team is stacked towards pitching and with weak offense. It's not like the Blue Jays were throwing out 9 Ozzie Smiths and 5 Bob Gibsons out there in 2008. Litsch, McGowan and Marcum, ie very average pitchers were overcoming the Rogers bandbox pretty easily while perfectly capable hitters like Wells, Rios, Lind, Stairs and Rolen along with the rest blasted only 126 home runs. There's nothing so extreme or inexcusable about the Rogers Centre's so-called hitter friendly atmosphere.
S33n Verified Member Posted August 21, 2014 Posted August 21, 2014 Because this team is built highly on its offence, nobody expected the pitching to do a damn thing. I'm not sure why this org. doesn't realize we're moving back into a pitching era of baseball, expecting to hit home runs every game and relying on them to win is ludicrous.
kgm1 Verified Member Posted August 21, 2014 Posted August 21, 2014 The rotation other than Stroman has been about what was expected . Well a few including me had hoped Dickey would rebound. The bull Pen has been s*** and that was something no one expected. The bull pen losses in April were brutal but most including AA said we would go as far as the Rotation takes us which is a 500 record . About right for the starters we have
ElNik2013 Old-Timey Member Posted August 22, 2014 Posted August 22, 2014 Good points. I wonder where the Jays would be at if they'd spent all their money on pitching rather than offence. I suppose there was a chance their pitching could have been average or a bit above, but it didn't turn out that way. I haven't done the research so I may end up being wrong, again, but my sense is that they've spent more than enough on pitching...it's just that they've spent on the wrong guys. Romero and Morrow haven't helped this franchise for 3 and 2 years respectively. Buehrle is making like 16M/year and will make 19 next season. Dickey is paid pretty fairly, but the expectation was that he was an Ace so once you include the young assets given up to acquire him, he's overpaid, IMO.
Slider Verified Member Posted August 22, 2014 Posted August 22, 2014 It doesn't help when a lot of your pitchers are atleast 30 years of age or older. Then you have two of your starters who are 35yrs old or older. They are getting old and the pitching rotation needs to get younger.
JoJo Parker Dunedin Blue Jays - A SS On Tuesday, Parker was just 1-for-5, but the one hit was his first professional home run. Explore JoJo Parker News >
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now