kcjaysfan Verified Member Posted June 27, 2013 Posted June 27, 2013 Pretty sure he's been fighting the urge to gnaw on a big slobbery dong for years. My lady friend seems to enjoy it, so perhaps he ought to give it a try.
kcjaysfan Verified Member Posted June 27, 2013 Posted June 27, 2013 Can one of you gay loving supporting people answer my original question? Would you still support the gay movement if it wasn't always a personal choice, but some kind of disorder that was received by "poisoning" (ie food, air, vaccines, subliminal)? Aside from those who want to deny homosexuals the same rights as others, who's claiming it's a personal choice?
DuckDuckGose Verified Member Posted June 27, 2013 Posted June 27, 2013 Yes, someone has sucked on my penis before. I know how it works.
kcjaysfan Verified Member Posted June 27, 2013 Posted June 27, 2013 You guys seem to be experienced the way you are slobbing eachothers knob right now. Because we clearly have to be gay to support them.
DuckDuckGose Verified Member Posted June 27, 2013 Posted June 27, 2013 Aside from those who want to deny homosexuals the same rights as others, who's claiming it's a personal choice? Even if it were a poison, toxin, whatever bs thing he claimed a rational person would want to help them, not negate them of rights.
Deadpool Old-Timey Member Posted June 27, 2013 Posted June 27, 2013 Can one of you gay loving supporting people answer my original question? Would you still support the gay movement if it wasn't always a personal choice, but some kind of disorder that was received by "poisoning" (ie food, air, vaccines, subliminal)? Would you support heterosexual marriage/coupling if women were 35' tall with vaginae filled with razor sharp fangs? What do you mean that's not a fair question because that's not a situation that exists? Hmm, maybe you should reconsider your question then.
Deadpool Old-Timey Member Posted June 27, 2013 Posted June 27, 2013 That's not a dodge, I poised a question to you based on retarded hypotheticals, just like you did to us.
DuckDuckGose Verified Member Posted June 27, 2013 Posted June 27, 2013 That's not a dodge, I poised a question to you based on retarded hypotheticals, just like you did to us. If per say the tooth fairy were real should he be taxed or not? If the sky were green would you like the colour blue more or less? If humans had fins would touch screens be easier or more difficult to use? If god were a leprechaun would he prefer one buckle on his boots or two?
dineke Old-Timey Member Posted June 27, 2013 Posted June 27, 2013 How is it a retarded question? Can you say without a shadow of doubt that there isn't a chemical way of turning someone gay? You're like neo with the dodges. Ahahahahahahahahahaha
kcjaysfan Verified Member Posted June 27, 2013 Posted June 27, 2013 If per say the tooth fairy were real should he be taxed or not? http://i200.photobucket.com/albums/aa40/biankita_87/ghetto_tooth_fairy.jpg
DuckDuckGose Verified Member Posted June 27, 2013 Posted June 27, 2013 Because being able to turn someone gay via chemicals is just so out there! Even though the us government has tried to make "gay bombs".. answer the question doggy mcgee The government has tried to make gay bombs? Proof or it didn't happen? Anyways as you said they tried which means it never actually worked out. You're living in la la land buddy. Does the Mad Hatter prefer black or chamomile tea?
Deadpool Old-Timey Member Posted June 27, 2013 Posted June 27, 2013 How is it a retarded question? Can you say without a shadow of doubt that there isn't a chemical way of turning someone gay? You're like neo with the dodges. It is an undeniably retarded question. You said "If [thing that is not true] were true, how would you react?" But I'll answer your undeniably retarded question. I would fully support it, because it's an issue that doesn't affect anyone but the person/people directly involved. If you want to cry yourself to sleep masturbating to pictures of Brett Lawrie, I'll support that too, because it doesn't involve me and what you do in the privacy of your bedroom with your Brett Lawrie blow-up doll is your business, not mine.
Deadpool Old-Timey Member Posted June 27, 2013 Posted June 27, 2013 Because being able to turn someone gay via chemicals is just so out there! Even though the us government has tried to make "gay bombs".. answer the question doggy mcgee Holy f***ing f***. f***. You really, really REALLY need to stop listening to Alex Jones and just accept that the government is not responsible for your insatiable desire for throbbing, hard (possibly black) cock.
DuckDuckGose Verified Member Posted June 27, 2013 Posted June 27, 2013 So you'd support a disease? Not try to cure it? If you support gay rights you would try to cure it, if you don't you would strip them of their rights and not help. You realize you are arguing against yourself over and over right?
Deadpool Old-Timey Member Posted June 27, 2013 Posted June 27, 2013 So you'd support a disease? Not try to cure it? Are the people with this hypothetical disease happy? What's the problem then? I'd be all for a disease that made me a millionaire, and I wouldn't want that cured.
Deadpool Old-Timey Member Posted June 27, 2013 Posted June 27, 2013 Maybe you've already been exposed to the chemical seeing how you can't get cocks off your brain? I'm pretty sure you're the one here that's been exposed to chemicals... https://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=flame-retardants-linked-lower-iq-hyperactivitiy-children
jaysfaithful8 Verified Member Posted June 27, 2013 Posted June 27, 2013 So you'd support a disease? Not try to cure it? This thread has turned borderline Nazi.
DuckDuckGose Verified Member Posted June 27, 2013 Posted June 27, 2013 I support the human race. Of course I would try to help cure them. What the hell are you talking about? But you wont give them rights?
Deadpool Old-Timey Member Posted June 27, 2013 Posted June 27, 2013 If hypothetically it was proven a disease why would I give them rights? Would you give rights to an autistic kid to smear poop on the walls? I would give an autistic kid the right to get married... Edit: When (s)he was a reasonable age, of course...
Deadpool Old-Timey Member Posted June 27, 2013 Posted June 27, 2013 This isn't about marriage, you're over simplifying things. Fine, I would give an Autistic kid all the rights of a non-Autistic kid. Which is EXACTLY what this is about.
DuckDuckGose Verified Member Posted June 27, 2013 Posted June 27, 2013 No I would give them rights to ensure they are treated like a human being.
Deadpool Old-Timey Member Posted June 27, 2013 Posted June 27, 2013 sorry too many sheep to keep up with here, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gay_bomb "...theoretical non-lethal chemical weapons, which a United States Air Force research laboratory speculated about producing,"
DuckDuckGose Verified Member Posted June 27, 2013 Posted June 27, 2013 This isn't about marriage, you're over simplifying things. There are autistic people that are far superior and will accomplish far more than your simple ass. Absolutely I would give them rights, voting, health care, workers comp, education and I would listen to their opinions to help make their lives better.
DuckDuckGose Verified Member Posted June 27, 2013 Posted June 27, 2013 sorry too many sheep to keep up with here, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gay_bomb HAHAHAHHA you linked to a failed government project whose science has been proven, irrefutably, to be false. So what you are saying is that it is NOT possible to drop a bomb and turn people gay? Glad we can agree.
jaysfaithful8 Verified Member Posted June 27, 2013 Posted June 27, 2013 If hypothetically it was proven a disease why would I give them rights? Would you give rights to an autistic kid to smear poop on the walls? http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/Const/page-15.html#h-45 15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability. Marginal note:Affirmative action programs (2) Subsection (1) does not preclude any law, program or activity that has as its object the amelioration of conditions of disadvantaged individuals or groups including those that are disadvantaged because of race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.
DuckDuckGose Verified Member Posted June 27, 2013 Posted June 27, 2013 Who is smug, the guy who thinks autistic people shouldn't have rights or the guy that calls him an *******?
DuckDuckGose Verified Member Posted June 27, 2013 Posted June 27, 2013 Because being able to turn someone gay via chemicals is just so out there! Even though the us government has tried to make "gay bombs".. answer the question doggy mcgee It's out there seeing as they tried and failed miserably.
DuckDuckGose Verified Member Posted June 27, 2013 Posted June 27, 2013 look at this poor loser you actually think in a proper society this nonsense would be tolerated this is destroying core values of male/female stop trying to be "progressive" you are enabling a society of degenerates Stop replying to yourself, it's pathetic.
Dr Negative Verified Member Posted June 27, 2013 Posted June 27, 2013 The United States military spent millions of dollars investigating psychic phenomena. I don't think this is evidence of anything apart from an out of control budget.
Arjun Nimmala Vancouver Canadians - A+ SS It's been slow going at the start of the season for Nimmala, but on Sunday, he was 3-for-5 with his 3rd home run and 3 RBI. Explore Arjun Nimmala News >
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now