Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Garrett Richards - yes, the Garrett Richards of 10 strikeouts and no walks tonight - is available for a pick.
Posted
Garrett Richards - yes, the Garrett Richards of 10 strikeouts and no walks tonight - is available for a pick.

 

I don’t know how many times I’ve sat a scrub on a Mon or Tues and then they do really good and then I’m like “I should’ve played the guy on a Tues”.. but then rinse and repeat

Community Moderator
Posted

In case anyone wants a laugh, I will present my production from SS this season:

 

Brandon Crawford - 12 GP 0.511 OPS

Leury Garcia - 5 GP 0.200 OPS

Nick Ahmed - 5 GP 0.048 OPS

Miguel Rojas - 4 GP 0.368 OPS

Freddy Galvis - 1 GP 2.000 OPS

 

It would be difficult to get production this bad from a position if you were deliberately streaming shitbags against aces trying to see how little you could get.

Posted
In case anyone wants a laugh, I will present my production from SS this season:

 

Brandon Crawford - 12 GP 0.511 OPS

Leury Garcia - 5 GP 0.200 OPS

Nick Ahmed - 5 GP 0.048 OPS

Miguel Rojas - 4 GP 0.368 OPS

Freddy Galvis - 1 GP 2.000 OPS

 

It would be difficult to get production this bad from a position if you were deliberately streaming shitbags against aces trying to see how little you could get.

 

One and done for you, eh.

Posted
In case anyone wants a laugh, I will present my production from SS this season:

 

Brandon Crawford - 12 GP 0.511 OPS

Leury Garcia - 5 GP 0.200 OPS

Nick Ahmed - 5 GP 0.048 OPS

Miguel Rojas - 4 GP 0.368 OPS

Freddy Galvis - 1 GP 2.000 OPS

 

It would be difficult to get production this bad from a position if you were deliberately streaming shitbags against aces trying to see how little you could get.

 

Javier Baez IS available

Posted
Wander will soon save me from this hell.

 

Or he takes after former #1 overall prospect Jurickson Profar.

 

Slash lines for both at A Ball. Same ages at 18.

 

.286/.390/.493

 

.318/.390/.506

Community Moderator
Posted
Or he takes after former #1 overall prospect Jurickson Profar.

 

Slash lines for both at A Ball. Same ages at 18.

 

.286/.390/.493

 

.318/.390/.506

 

I super like this post

Posted
Or he takes after former #1 overall prospect Jurickson Profar.

 

Slash lines for both at A Ball. Same ages at 18.

 

.286/.390/.493

 

.318/.390/.506

 

Pretty selective are you.

Community Moderator
Posted
Let's bring forward the lazy Profar/Wander comp in a year or so.

 

It's not a comp. Wise ass cat is just showing you guys the lower end of all realistic possibilities

Posted
It's not a comp. Wise ass cat is just showing you guys the lower end of all realistic possibilities

 

Very low end. And lazy as Profar wRC+ 1st three minor league seasons are 101, 142, 127, Wander 159, 155, 157.

 

Profar struggled when he went up against advanced pitching. By all reports, Wander has not.

Community Moderator
Posted
Very low end. And lazy as Profar wRC+ 1st three minor league seasons are 101, 142, 127, Wander 159, 155, 157.

 

Profar struggled when he went up against advanced pitching. By all reports, Wander has not.

 

The congruent data point of them both being #1 prospects in the scouting community is probably worth more than the data point of Franco's wRC+ figures in A+ and below.

Posted
The congruent data point of them both being #1 prospects in the scouting community is probably worth more than the data point of Franco's wRC+ figures in A+ and below.

 

You are weighing subjective data over objective?

Posted
Very low end. And lazy as Profar wRC+ 1st three minor league seasons are 101, 142, 127, Wander 159, 155, 157.

 

Profar struggled when he went up against advanced pitching. By all reports, Wander has not.

 

Here's a more recent top prospect. Not sure he quite hit #1 though on all lists.

 

Through first 175 games:

 

Franco = 157wRC+

 

Robles = 162wRC+

Posted
Here's a more recent top prospect. Not sure he quite hit #1 though on all lists.

 

Through first 175 games:

 

Franco = 157wRC+

 

Robles = 162wRC+

 

Exit velocities?

Community Moderator
Posted
You are weighing subjective data over objective?

 

Yeah, sometimes you should. It's not an objective vs. subjective binary where objective info is always better.

 

Batting average in high school is an objective measurement. You would not use that over a subjective scout's opinion on hit tool.

 

You would not use a gulf coast league wRC+ over scouting consensus.

Posted
Combination of historical strikeout rates and expanded 26 man dynasty rosters mean the replacement level hitter in this league now looks like LOD. Christ it's a wasteland.
Community Moderator
Posted
Combination of historical strikeout rates and expanded 26 man dynasty rosters mean the replacement level hitter in this league now looks like LOD. Christ it's a wasteland.

 

Ooo, not even close. Best available hitters in LoD are backup catchers with 10% own rates. Here you've got some decent hitters

Posted
Ooo, not even close. Best available hitters in LoD are backup catchers with 10% own rates. Here you've got some decent hitters

 

Yeah, roster sizes might be the same, but it's still 30 teams vs 20 teams, which puts LOD 260 players deeper, plus 100 milb guys = 360 players off the board, that are available here.

Posted
In case anyone wants a laugh, I will present my production from SS this season:

 

Brandon Crawford - 12 GP 0.511 OPS

Leury Garcia - 5 GP 0.200 OPS

Nick Ahmed - 5 GP 0.048 OPS

Miguel Rojas - 4 GP 0.368 OPS

Freddy Galvis - 1 GP 2.000 OPS

 

It would be difficult to get production this bad from a position if you were deliberately streaming shitbags against aces trying to see how little you could get.

 

I would still do Bichette for Wander right now!

Posted

I’m with Dinger on this. If you lose a position to injury and don’t already have a backup rostered you’re gonna get stuck running trash out there.

 

Highest owned percentage hitter right now on the FA list is Hernandez. Owner of a .528 OPS. I had the privilege of owner him for a few days when Bryant was down, would not recommend.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Blue Jays community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...