Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Odds are stacked against him in the Norris, but he just might find a way to come through in the clutch!
Old-Timey Member
Posted
Also, the second goals by both teams were hilariously bad goaltending fails.
Dat Hamilton goal...
Community Moderator
Posted
Johnson isn't really a backup, or backup quality at least. He is just behind a top 5ish goalie.

 

lmao holy f*** ok, biased much

Community Moderator
Posted
Well large sample EV SV% is the best public metric for goalies... so yes.

 

He played on a lockdown defensive team in STL, he switched teams within your sample, he's like 40th this year in SV% or something... SV% is like 2/3 team, 1/3 goalie.

 

Guaranteed, gun to your head, there are like 15 goalies you would take over Elliot right now.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Well large sample EV SV% is the best public metric for goalies... so yes.

Do you know what kind of metrics they use to evaluate goalies internally?

Posted
He played on a lockdown defensive team in STL, he switched teams within your sample, he's like 40th this year in SV% or something... SV% is like 2/3 team, 1/3 goalie.

 

Guaranteed, gun to your head, there are like 15 goalies you would take over Elliot right now.

More like 3/4 luck, 3/16 team, 1/16 goalie, but yes your point stands. Can't take anything from just this year with any meaning though.

He's also only 22nd out of 43 goalies in EV SV% this year when I set the limit to 25 games. Overall SV% is skewed by Calgary penalties.

Posted

Tier 1

Price

 

Tier 2

Holtby

Lundqvist

Rask

 

Tier 3

Crawford

Elliot

Murray

Dubnyk

Schneider

Talbot

Bobrovsky

Anderson

Mason

Bishop

Quick

Gibson

Andersen

 

Tier 4

Miller

Lehner

Greiss

Johnson

Rinne

Smith

Varlamov

Allen

Fleury

etc.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
That Boston line is filth. Have all 3 on my fantasy hockey team. Fun to watch. Marchand is playing on another level.
Community Moderator
Posted
Close enough, but some guys like Bobrovsky, Anderson, and Dubnyk probably belong either in tier 2 or in tier 2.5
Old-Timey Member
Posted
Close enough, but some guys like Bobrovsky, Anderson, and Dubnyk probably belong either in tier 2 or in tier 2.5
I'd throw Murray in that tier as well. #notbiased
Posted
I'd throw Murray in that tier as well. #notbiased

Just not enough sample yet to do that. Though he seems to be heading that way.

Posted

The real question is if only 1/16 of the value is a result of the player, why bother using tiers at all.

 

On another note, I don't believe that at all.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Just not enough sample yet to do that. Though he seems to be heading that way.
Yup, totally understandable - only 54 regular season games under his belt thus far. He seems legit, though we'll see soon enough.

 

By the way, I'm totally not a Penguins fan!

Posted
The real question is if only 1/16 of the value is a result of the player, why bother using tiers at all.

 

On another note, I don't believe that at all.

When you try to project goalies SV% and properly regress to the mean, the SV% spread from top to bottom is only around .005. There really isn't a good way to evaluate goalies yet unless you have much better data than just shots and goals.

Community Moderator
Posted
The real question is if only 1/16 of the value is a result of the player, why bother using tiers at all.

 

On another note, I don't believe that at all.

 

It's more like 1/6 of the measurable skill is the result of the player. That's slightly different. There are still obviously better goalies, and value is distributed like skill at a position in any sport - it's just really hard to tell through all the noise who is good and who is average.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Yup, totally understandable - only 54 regular season games under his belt thus far. He seems legit, though we'll see soon enough.

3000 shots on goal is the stabilization point by my understanding and he's at ~1200

Old-Timey Member
Posted
3000 shots on goal is the stabilization point by my understanding and he's at ~1200
1500. But yes, the point stands. He's at 2100 if you include last season's playoffs, but I guess we can't really do that. And the point still stands regardless.
Old-Timey Member
Posted
1500. But yes, the point stands. He's at 2100 if you include last season's playoffs, but I guess we can't really do that. And the point still stands regardless.

1200 even strength

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund
The Jays Centre Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Blue Jays community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...