Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

Brownie19

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    20,703
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    37

 Content Type 

Profiles

Toronto Blue Jays Videos

2026 Toronto Blue Jays Top Prospects Ranking

Toronto Blue Jays Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Toronto Blue Jays Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Toronto Blue Jays Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Brownie19

  1. http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/balbino-fuenmayor-from-indy-baller-to-relevant-prospect/ Here's another reason to fire AA - how on earth didn't he see the potential in this guy?
  2. To the haters - I'd be interested to know who you think are the "good" GM's in baseball and who's the guy we'd be able to get who would obviously be better than AA?
  3. You're missing out. This has been extremely entertaining
  4. I agree with this. I find it odd that so many people jump all over the Marlins deal. Hech has put up 0.0 WAR over 2.5 season with the Marlins Alvarez: 4.1 WAR DeSclafani: 1.5 WAR Escobar: 5.1 WAR Marisnick: 1.0 WAR and no longer much of a prospect Nicolino: 0.0 WAR and no longer much of a prospect Meanwhile, Buehrle has put up 6.8 WAR and Reyes another 7.0 WAR. I don't think many if any were sad to see Escobar go, yet he's the best of the bunch so far and I know very few though highly of DeSclafani. I get that Buehrle and Reyes cost a lot - but they've been wayyyy better than the package AA gave up and let's be honest, with the ORGANIZATIONAL restriction on length of FA contracts (which does hamper AA's ability) - it's hard to get FA's to sign here when all you have is Jose/Edwin and a bunch of prospects.
  5. Right - the GM has total control over injuries (Stroman, Saunders, Reyes, Lawrie, Bautista, Santos, Morrow, Sanchez, etc.) as well as which players under and over perform. TOTAL CONTROL. There is absolutely no chance in the game of baseball - the GM is the only person who control's which teams win and which teams lose. FYSMC.
  6. I didn't expect you to get it - but that point is, no matter what moves he makes, there are a TON of things that are simply out of his control. Just like a pitcher. I should just put you back on ignore.
  7. Why wouldn't they consent if they were going to a contender?
  8. This analogy is like judging a starting pitcher based solely on wins and losses...
  9. The problem is the amount of money he's owed....
  10. I highly suspect they'd keep DeGrom over Syndergaard. DeGrom is a beast already. He's what Synder aspires to be.
  11. While I don't like how Wilner defends Jays player to no end - I do love that he tells fans when they are stupid....which is about 85% of his audience. I'm not sure I'd ever listened to a show that would be so blunt (and typically right) when people phone in with blabbering nonsense.
  12. What's funny about this is you seemingly put Travis and Donaldson at the same level. These guys are MILES apart.
  13. You mean that buy low window of the last 149 games where he's been awful? (wRC+ of 85, WAR of 0.0)
  14. Actually - the thought is Shark isn't going to be enough to make this team a playoff team (let alone a WS contender) and thus why deal a young pitcher for a 2 month rental (even if it's Sanchez). Shark is NOT a #1. He's better than what we have, but he's not a difference maker that Cueto/Hamels are.
  15. And when we miss the playoffs and that deal sets us back a couple of years - you'll be happy?
  16. WTF would you do that? because you're a tard?
  17. That's a really good explanation - thanks man. I'm really gratefully to have found this forum. I wonder if we'll ever see a day where a manager purposely matches up a fly ball pitcher vs. a fly ball hitter (say Chris Carter) out of the bullpen
  18. Sorry I asked in the wrong thread. Is it the same for hitters? LD% isn't talent-based, just luck? that seems nuts.
  19. I asked this before, but nobody answered (wtf). You're saying LD% isn't talent-based because it doesn't correlate year-to-year and is subjective. It would certainly seem as though GB% and FB% are talent-based (fly ball and groundball pitchers) and those numbers do tend to correlate year-to-year....Does LD% simply get the shaft because it's more subjective than the other 2?
  20. Wouldn't the reason be to escape the bloody abyss that is the Toronto Blue Jays to join a contending club and chase the dream of winning a World Series?
  21. You guys are smarter than me. You're saying a pitcher has no control over what LD% he allows? It certainly appears some pitchers have control over their GB% and FB% (ie, groundball and fly ball pitcher) - why is it they can control that, but not LD%? Learn me wise ones.
  22. That rotation is turrrible
  23. Unfortunately, this is true. The vast majority of the public is stupid and thus doesn't realise the SN guys are dum dums. The people who really follow baseball simply can't listen to pre-game shows or whatever these days because it makes you want to puke.
  24. I like where this is going Ang - could make a lot of sense too as the Cards need a bat at 1st. I hope you're the MLB trade whisperer.
  25. I would fully support this. I have loved watching E5 over the years, but he's a logical guy to move now.
×
×
  • Create New...