This is exactly it. He used to be more objective, and I remember him actually questioning JPR moves with JPR was ON the show with him. Since he got suspended for questioning Cito he's been pretty much intolerable with his steadfast defense of the Jays. Blue Jays Talk should be renamed Defend the Blue Jays Talk, because his natural instinct now is to find whatever facts he can spin to use to defend the players, Gibbons, AA, without giving any real objective thought to it.
If that is his job description, to defend the Jays and promote viewership, then thats fine. He has a family and needs a salary, and the cito-induced suspension made him fear he could lose all that. Just don't hide behind objective journalism, and say that youre speaking facts, when youre really spinning facts.
The epitome of Wilner was Russell Martin comments last Oct/Nov, when a caller asked him if the Jays should sign Martin because he was Canadian, a winner, a good leader, good defensive catcher for the young arms, decent bat, etc. Wilner went into his usual diatribe reserved for any one who isnt associated with the Jays, saying he had a low OBP the few years before last, he would cost way too much, he would want way too many years, leadership and 'winnership' are overrated and there was no such thing, we had Navarro, being canadian is irrelevant, etc. etc. etc. Now we hear the exact opposite: He's a winner, great leader, great framing skills, helps the young arms, Navarro only had one year left and is a valuable backup/DH, brings out fans because hes from Toronto/Montreal. etc etc. etc. When that same caller called this May, too call him out on his hypocrisy, Mike was like Well....Hes a Blue Jay Now!!!
What a joke.