Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

Jimcanuck

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    25,277
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Profiles

Toronto Blue Jays Videos

2026 Toronto Blue Jays Top Prospects Ranking

Toronto Blue Jays Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Toronto Blue Jays Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Toronto Blue Jays Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Jimcanuck

  1. Holy f*** he gets paid for that s***?
  2. Just noticed it now, wow! Even tango clowning on cpee
  3. If a player plays out of position, and struggles, of course it may impact hitting. I don't think playing 1b, 3b, or dh qualifies as vlad playing out of position.
  4. The reality is Tango has not been back after being subjected to your idiocy. Good job Connor.
  5. The closer a player gets to FA, the lower their value. Then we have Bo, starting to get a history of soft tissue injuries, and a history of being lost at the plate for long stretches (not just this year). I expect if you game the various probabilities, trading sooner than later is ahead by a good measure.
  6. So basically the JD approach. I don't agree. It is most likely, same as it was with JD, that Bo loses more value the longer the Jays retain him.
  7. If he retains value, and I agree with you, Jays are better off not taking the risk of a slow start in 2025. Long ago I advocated many many times on here to trade JD in the offseason after he finished the previous season strongly. Saying the same thing now, trade Bo in the offseason. The risk of poor performance or injury in the 1st half of 2025 is too high.
  8. Isn't Bo kinda in the same mold as Javier Baez?
  9. Bassitt probably knows about the arm health, or lack thereof, of gausman and berrios and other pitchers. If he does, there is no way he would talk about it. Agree it is unlikely he is referring to clubhouse issues
  10. If the red Sox increase the number of right handed hitters this off-season, the fenway park factor likely increases.
  11. Reading way too much into what I posted. Someone said the safeco factor is 88. I responded that the ass M's offense could be a reason. If the park factor drops from 89 to 88 in a year, as I said it's most likely Stat noise from non-linearity and bias effects. Nothing in a universe of electrons randomly spinning around nucleii is truly linear.
  12. If you think it's a linear relationship even at the extremes, by definition you are the flat earther
  13. The change in spread is because a lower park factor is to the pitchers advantage and a higher factor to the hitters advantage.
  14. The spread between runs scored at home (low park factor) and away (higher park factor) will increase with a strong pitching staff and weak hitters. Conversely, the spread will decrease with weak pitching and strong hitting. I could show this mathematically but I'm retired and can't be arsed.
  15. Even for that simple model, the fact the M's have a strong pitching staff and ass hitters this year will lower the park factor.
  16. I can't make sense of your talking points, so no
  17. Fluctuations in park factor is stat noise unless changes have been made to the park. Any model has weaknesses that get worse at the extremes, and may apply to the ass M's hitters in 2024.
  18. I'm sure it gets factored in, but no model is perfect. J-Rod 110 wRC+ away and 90 at home, hmmm
  19. Could the fact the M's hitters have been ass have anything to do with it?
  20. Devastating for fantasy owners
  21. What IPTV provider do you folks use?
  22. Best to bring up a couple of BP options IMO. BP guys tend not to get good until late 20's anyway. Give them a taste. Danner in particular.
  23. For showing ignorance
×
×
  • Create New...