Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

G-Snarls

Community Moderator
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    40,733

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    12

 Content Type 

Profiles

Toronto Blue Jays Videos

2025 Toronto Blue Jays Top Prospects Ranking

Toronto Blue Jays Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Toronto Blue Jays Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by G-Snarls

  1. G-Snarls
    Similar yes. Not sure either team really wanted the offers to get accepted. Probably not. One major difference: Orioles payroll 116M Astros payroll 69M
  2. G-Snarls
    True And I'm in favour of offering it. I think it's a risk worth taking as I said earlier I was just opposed to the "planning on 3 draft picks" plan
  3. G-Snarls
    That ended up consuming 23.7% of the Astros payroll for this year and he has barely put up 1 WAR Teams must be starting to get nervous about making these offers for the second tier players
  4. G-Snarls
    The problem is you can't guarantee Saunders will turn it down
  5. G-Snarls
    That's the tricky thing. You're not dealing with them one at a time in the order you want to You're juggling all if them at once
  6. G-Snarls
    Saunders now has "All Star" on his resume How much is that worth in the eyes of GM's?
  7. G-Snarls
    After thinking it over, I have no problem with all 3 being given the QO There's only a risk with Saunders and it's probably worth it For Bautista you're OK making the offer because you're not upset if he accepts it. That would be great actually. You hang on to him for another year with a legit chance at contention, and chances are he's worth it even with a modest season. It's less than a 3M increase for him. Then you can go through the same process next year. Edwin clearly won't accept it and will obviously get better offers from the Jays and others, so you're either keeping him for several years or collecting a draft pick. Saunders is exactly the type/caliber of player who is most constrained by the QO and it's probably worth making the offer, hoping to either collect a draft pick or get him on a cheaper 2 year deal or something. It's *probably* worth the risk for a team with a decent budget like the Jays have.
  8. G-Snarls
    How about 2 years 24M for Saunders Gives him more than the QO but less per year but 2 years of security. Players frequently will accept lower AAV for longer terms, and most of them probably hate 1 year deals Crazy to think 1/3 of the way through the season that would have seemed laughable. That he'd get 4 or more years at 15M. I don't think so now.
  9. G-Snarls
    Exactly right Prices fluctuate wildly
  10. G-Snarls
    Agreed
  11. G-Snarls
    Barker is nearly incomprehensible sometimes
  12. G-Snarls
    Most frustrating game in a while Bbaaaahhhhhhhh
  13. G-Snarls
    f***!!!
  14. G-Snarls
    No no no
  15. G-Snarls
    Damn, Lake is quick
  16. G-Snarls
    Sweet set JD
  17. G-Snarls
    Travis is who I want most vs Bettances Is that weird??
  18. G-Snarls
    Or McCann
  19. G-Snarls
    OMG Thole nice
  20. G-Snarls
    Tragically, yes
  21. G-Snarls
    Thole up!
  22. G-Snarls
    Bettances might be scarier than Chapman
  23. G-Snarls
    Come on Gibby Do the right thing
  24. G-Snarls
    Phew
  25. G-Snarls
    I know I was feeling despondent for a second
×
×
  • Create New...