Abomination
-
Posts
24,877 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Toronto Blue Jays Videos
2025 Toronto Blue Jays Top Prospects Ranking
Toronto Blue Jays Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
Guides & Resources
2025 Toronto Blue Jays Draft Pick Tracker
News
Forums
Blogs
Events
Store
Downloads
Gallery
Everything posted by Abomination
-
Absolutely!
-
Yeah, that's basically what I'm trying to say. Plane, movement, deception, etc really are part of "stuff". He either has it or he doesn't, and all signs point to him having it. The only real worry imo regarding his height is durability. So far it doesn't appear to be an issue, and even if it does later on in life he can move to the pen when it occurs. Even guys like Tom Gordon who did eventually move to the pen put up good seasons as a starter first (and Gordon didn't have Stroman's command).
-
You're completely missing my point. How many closers (or other major league relievers period) have been 5'9 or less since 1960 and pitched more than say 50 relief appearances? I don't know the answer, but it probably totals less than 10 or 15 - it'll be 'small' whatever it is. Does that mean he shouldn't be a pitcher at all because almost no one else that size is, even if he has lights out stuff? Sure a taller pitcher has an advantage with all else being equal (all else almost never is), but the only thing that matters at the MLB level is ability and results. No reason not the treat him as a starter until (if) he proves he can't handle it, which is the same for any pitcher regardless of size. My point on Abbott was suggesting limitations on physical attributes. It has nothing to do with Abbott's size.
-
What matters is stuff, not physical size etc. Would you say someone with great stuff should never be given a chance to pitch because they only have one hand, and only (to my knowledge) one person has ever done that? There's always people in life that are exceptions. It's stupid to never take advantage of those opportunities because of preconceived notions. BTW, how many closers have there been 5'9 or shorter? If the answer is also 2, does that mean he shouldn't be a closer either?
-
Spanky should totally make that his avatar!
-
It's still a good ballpark to pitch in even if it is neutral (one year of data since moving the fences in probably isn't enough to tell - it is one year since they did, isn't it?). Also, the retractable roof and good climate add to the benefit.
-
The writer that's first to reliably post it may be impossible to prove. I mean heck, some of them posted it with certainty yesterday ...
-
How many times have you gotten wasted and LOST your wallet at the bar or in a fight? Is it a zero-sum game?
-
It almost feels like both teams (Jays and O's) are being played by his agent. He finally decides on a 1 year deal, so spew out a bunch of nonsense to target two teams with a need and cash to set the market, then choose a team with a good ballpark to pitch in once the bar is raised (*cough* Seattle).
-
Dunno, maybe. Multiple places seeming to indicate that it's not too serious (although initial diagnosis aren't all that accurate).
-
Initial diagnosis is a mild forearm strain.
-
Gameday pitch counts aren't accurate for spring training (unless they've changed something recently). An out is 1 strike, a strikeout is 3 strikes, and a walk is 4 balls. I think the first pitch is also counted, along with plays (WP, SB, etc). Other than that, nothing counts.
-
I see your point. Yeah, the old formulas may be tweakable for previous seasons, but the flaws will remain (just may not dominate as much).
-
Just the standard pre-requisite TJS
-
Well, the numbers produced by MLBAM will be used to create the data sets used in the new metrics, so it's not really about testing them. What could be a REALLY interesting side note is to also see some of the improvement in offensive stats and predictions the new data can produce, such as a proper speed index which could possibly be used to more accurately predict aging. We could also see BABIP be eliminated (and it's about time).
-
No, they're on the cusp of actually becoming pretty damn accurate. It'll be interesting to see how (or if) things change for some guys like Hech where what we see doesn't match with the numbers.
-
I think I remember him looking horrible last spring too early on (not sure what the results were). Guess he just takes a little while to lock in.
-
As I said, Stroman was apparently in the 170ish innings range last year between the minors, afl, and extended spring. He should be fine for over 200 this year. I do NOT want to see both Happ AND Rogers in the rotation to start the year! I'd rather see neither.
-
Apparently the Mariners now want to deal for Viciedo. Someone needs to tell them that acquiring boatloads of players who can't play defense is NOT exploiting a market inefficiency!
-
If people are running anything other than Chrome or Firefox, they need to switch imo.
-
There seems to be a big effort from the players to really support Romero this spring. Hopefully it works.
-
It's interesting from Lind. AA has said neither pitcher will be on an innings count, although Hutch probably should be. Stroman last year apparently had the equivalent of around 170ish so should be fine. Regarding Romero, if he can throw strikes he should absolutely be in the rotation - but he has to throw strikes.
-
People might find this rather amusing: http://grantland.com/features/the-nhls-top-secret-trade-request-application/
-
Yes, I was watching the game. He made some massive saves later though at least.
-
ESPN: Jose Reyes ready to take flight
Abomination replied to theblujay's topic in Toronto Blue Jays Talk
I'm sure they were looking, but I don't see it happening. What the hell would they even offer that might fit for us going forward (unless it was Gardner)?