JaysAllMighty Old-Timey Member Posted November 24, 2013 Posted November 24, 2013 Well if we're stuck with JPA for another season I sure hope our new hitting coach can make him a productive bat. But his defense... that's hopeless.
mitchf Verified Member Posted November 24, 2013 Posted November 24, 2013 Janssen + Pillar for Hanigan, and Santos for for Cervelli/Stewart. Extend Hanigan 2 + option. We now have a rock solid but unspectacular catching tandem for 2-3 years, lower 2014 salary commitments, and lose basically nothing of value. Trading a "rock solid closer with the mental toughness to pitch in the AL East" for a guy with a career .350 SLG just doesn't seem to fit the criteria for what our GM values. However, I agree. It'd be brilliant.
fatcowxlive Old-Timey Member Posted November 24, 2013 Posted November 24, 2013 Janssen + Pillar for Hanigan, and Santos for for Cervelli/Stewart. Extend Hanigan 2 + option. We now have a rock solid but unspectacular catching tandem for 2-3 years, lower 2014 salary commitments, and lose basically nothing of value. Why would we burn Janssen on Hanigan?
KingKat Old-Timey Member Posted November 24, 2013 Posted November 24, 2013 Why would we burn Janssen on Hanigan? Because the team has many competent relievers and no competent catchers?
Angrioter Old-Timey Member Posted November 24, 2013 Author Posted November 24, 2013 What do you think that + is? Not much, but I definitely don't think you're adding to Janssen to get Hanigan. The Reds would love to get a closer and slide Chapman into the rotation. Maybe a pinch runner called Billy Hamilton?
fatcowxlive Old-Timey Member Posted November 24, 2013 Posted November 24, 2013 Because the team has many competent relievers and no competent catchers? I'm not opposing trading Jannsen+ for a catcher... But Hanigan? Shouldn't we be aiming higher?
KingKat Old-Timey Member Posted November 24, 2013 Posted November 24, 2013 I'm not opposing trading Jannsen+ for a catcher... But Hanigan? Shouldn't we be aiming higher? AA says the bulk of his money is earmarked for pitching so I don't think there's much higher to aim. Could trade a different pitcher though.
Maine Jays Verified Member Posted November 25, 2013 Posted November 25, 2013 Rather have AJ on a one year plus option than anyone else discussed. Hell, we're talking about Molina as an upgrade over JP, so the bar isn't being set very high here.
JoJo Parker Dunedin Blue Jays - A SS On Tuesday, Parker was just 1-for-5, but the one hit was his first professional home run. Explore JoJo Parker News >
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now