Jump to content
Jays Centre
  • Create Account

LTR

Verified Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    2,666

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Toronto Blue Jays Videos

2025 Toronto Blue Jays Top Prospects Ranking

Toronto Blue Jays Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Toronto Blue Jays Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by LTR

  1. LTR
    Donaldson must feel like he's playing with a bunch of has-beens and misfits
  2. LTR
    Good start
  3. LTR
    No, actually the burden of proof is on you. I already provided sufficient evidence. You're the one who made the original point and you have provided nothing.
  4. LTR
    Must have just changed! I checked it earlier and it was Gonza.
  5. LTR
    It's obvious. And I'm saying the soft% stat itself is not related to BABIP, as I already said soft% is comprised of hits and non-hits (BABIP measures hits on balls in play, in case you didn't know)... whether a player gets a hit on a ball in play or not does not affect soft%, how many more ways can I explain this... lol x infinity.
  6. LTR
    He seemed so good, when he was going good, I hope he can be good again. He could be really good!
  7. LTR
    I heard he's "not 100%" - Gibbons. But perhaps this is just mindgames, hoping the Nats will hear this and try to run on him? Probably not.
  8. LTR
    I'd love to see you say that to his face! (And see what happens as a result)
  9. LTR
    That wasn't the point at all. The point was not that they are having good years but that the list is obviously comprised of good pitchers (I purposely did not provide any other data other than pitcher name and soft%). Did you know one of the first signs of intelligence in humans (the genus of hominids) was the ability to distinguish patterns? I'm really sorry though, as it seems this particular genetic trait has skipped your lineage all together. No, I said soft% is not related to BABIP because it has nothing to do with whether the ball is in play or not. Saying a pitcher can't control quality of contact is like saying a pitcher can't control his SwStr%, it's the same thing... whether you miss a bat totally or by a little, it's the same deal.
  10. LTR
    It's not my fault you can't analyse a basic table of data and see there's an obvious correlation
  11. LTR
    Why on earth would I waste my time doing this? Also I would never use ERA if I did.
  12. LTR
    Is Pompey's confidence shot for good? I know he had a triple last night but otherwise he's had 2 XBH in nearly 90 AB... pretty atrocious. That's like Josh Thole territory, worse.
  13. LTR
    What are you even talking about? I never mentioned BABIP, plus soft% has no relationship to BABIP as it relates to both hits and non-hits. That's funny I thought I already did when I showed that the best pitchers in the game are inducing weak contact? I guess you need a pretty chart with colors in it to help you understand.
  14. LTR
    Zimmerman, Scherzer, Gonzalez. There's a strong chance we don't win a game. Jays fair 'especially' bad vs good pitching. Let's just hope they put Casey Janssen in a couple games... he's a shadow of his former self and his top velocity down nearly 5mph. He's throwing taters out there, will located taters probably, but taters nevertheless.
  15. LTR
    So now we're back to the 1990's and using the "eye test".
  16. LTR
    I would agree with this if Colabello hadn't cost us two games with his D (not sure if and how many games he won with his bat). Don't mind Carrera at all, can't believe people were totally blaming him for losing a ball in the sun... could happen to anyone.
  17. LTR
    Scratch this. Won't even be playing tonight based on weather reports. Surprised it wasn't cancelled already.
  18. LTR
    I have the Jays with the second worst win% of any team tonight. 0.36% chance.
  19. LTR
    Carrera is actually not that bad. 103 wRC+ which doesn't include his baserunning and the dude has some jets. He hasn't had much success in the majors but he may still have something to show.
  20. LTR
    You mean the guy with 18 walks in 27 innings in AAA? You're hired!
  21. LTR
    Hope you're all ready for another Reyes hate-on!!
  22. LTR
    You also forgot number of people in attendence at the stadium. As we know with quantum mechanics, the observer or observers in this case may have what is called an observers effect on the behavior of subatomic particles, thus effecting the energy in play of the atoms in motion.
  23. LTR
    There we go. By the way, on the topic of CS% being useless... I'm surprised you didn't even mention the opposing runners in your bullet list. Some divisions/leagues might have faster/more effective runners, plus the distribution of those running against could be better or worse, depending. Also, was the stadium open or close? How about air density? Temperature? How many games were played at Coors field? Did the catcher get laid the night before? Did he have a healthy breakfast that day? What else am I missing?
  24. LTR
    Never asked for anything like that. How about a normal discussion about catchers and catcher arms? Maybe some discussion about Martin's great arm? Guess that's too much to ask.
  25. LTR
    You went way out of your way to make up a whole bunch of points about CS% not being valid (relatively untrue) just to spite my thread. I call that being a prick.
×
×
  • Create New...