I watched a few innings of the MLB broadcast, and while I found it very much enjoyable, I have a few comments about it:
-I get it, you can't shove wOBA and wRC+ down people's throats, but as both are better models that assess hitting performance, I felt they should have at least introduced them as the valuable statistics than they are rather than focus on OPS and OPS+ like they did for most of the broadcast.
-Despite the attempt at utilizing more advanced statistics, guys like Millar still went on long rants where he valued RBI and batting average higher. It's inevitable that the casual in the booth would go to the traditional statistics that he knows at heart, but having dedicated portions where one guy talks about the value of "run producing" is annoying if their focus is to ease fans into more indicative stats of performance. Arguing that Cespedes was a better fit for the Mets than Carlos Gomez because the former has a greater chance to produce 90-100 RBI and is "a presence at the plate" is cringy.
-Umps suck, there's no doubt about it, but I would have appreciated if they mentioned something about catcher framing. Both teams (Giants and Astros) employ good framers, their contributions could have been noted rather than acting dumbfounded whenever there was a bad strike call or when a pitch that was clearly a ball almost looked like a strike.